Everything I've heard around the water cooler is that Dez told the coaches he was 100% "N" and pulled the old flakarooni. Always sucks to lose a guy like Dez heads-up at the 11th hour, especially to a dodgy bastage like Petrino.
I'm not sure how the coaches could have played this much differently though. It's difficult to play the "take the Louisville visit and you lose your spot" card to a guy that you initially poached from Louisville.
This is an interesting point. I'm not saying the coaches played this wrong. Anyone would have to be much closer to this decision than anyone here is, even the most informed posters, to really know that. You'd have to be "in the room", and even then, you'd have to be a better judge of tactics than Riley and whoever was key in handling this. So anything I say here is for discussion purposes only. I am not criticizing Riley at all.
But I don't agree that our poaching Dez from Louisville specifically means the coaches couldn't have tried to use the "go there and you lose your spot" card. First, and easiest, it would be simple for our coaches to point out while doing so, that the late hour is the reason they would have to insist on that. This has the advantage of being really, really true, so the threat would be credible. When we poached Dez, Louisville had forever to back fill. The principle here isn't that you somehow have to be fair and never change your mind, or get somebody else to change their mind. It's only that if you don't want to be a real ******** in life, you don't want to leave people hanging without alternatives at the last moment unnecessarily.
The second reason why the staff could have told Dez not to go still depends on the lateness of the hour, but is not exactly the same. It's just a fact of life that everyone in life has to and gets to play their own hand. That's true of Dez and true of the Huskers and all of their counterparts out there. You still want to avoid unnecessarily quashing people's options, especially if you aren't really offering them something solid, but there is no reason at all that you can't simply say, "Look, I know we took you from Louisville, but that doesn't really matter. We want you, we need you. We will have a spot for you. If you want us to keep that for sure, you have to shut your recruiting down." There is no moral or practical reason the coaches can't simply say something like that, regardless of how we poached him from Louisville in the past. They've got to play their hand, and everyone else in the game knows they do and has to do the same thing. That's just life.
The real challenge for the staff in deciding this instead would have been the old dilemma of risk-reward in letting him go. Do you risk losing him if you let him go? Do you actually have a chance of getting someone better? These coaches have felt the sharp points of the horns of that dilemma many times I'm sure, so they have their own way of thinking about it. But again, it's really hard for anyone, and impossible for anyone here except a top 50 D1 coach who is lurking (as if they had the time), to judge Riley on how he calculated this in one specific instance in one specific year. At the very least, you'd have to see him get his lunch taken away from him over and over in multiple years before you could judge he was being too soft or some other diagnosis, and even then, it would be a stretch.