We can't all be 100%. You're welcome to challenge.
I don't think you can look at not signing any of these kids in a vacuum.
Two are at positions we didn't need or want to chase in this cycle (TE). That's changed due to defections, injuries, etc., but that's where that position started last year.
Not all four are Nebraska kids. Two of the four are transplants. They don't have Nebraska roots. That matters. I was a Nebraska kid who moved to Colorado and had I had a Nebraska AND a Colorado offer back in the day, I'm picking the Huskers. Piss on choosing the school I was closest to geographically, I had Husker ties. You have to look at these kids through those lenses as well. Do any of them have true Nebraska ties?
Anyway, you can't condemn the staff for this. You can look at it and evaluate, but it's not an automatic 'You should have gotten these kids'. It's just not.
Not accurate at all. So Nebraska "didn't need or want to chase" a TE this class? A position group that might lose its top two on the depth chart and has no experience behind them? OK. They have a TE commit in this class BTW, I guess Frost didn't get the memo that they didn't need one.
In fact, all four players they missed on play positions the staff either needs in this class or have multiple commits from that positron group, proving they indeed could have used them.
The actual fact is, they were outrecruited by other teams and/or the kids were wary about all the losing.