Pernell: Does Scott Frost Deserve a Fifth Season at Nebraska?
Anything worse than a 2-2 finish could force Trev Alberts’ hand
www.si.com
Yes.Pernell: Does Scott Frost Deserve a Fifth Season at Nebraska?
Anything worse than a 2-2 finish could force Trev Alberts’ handwww.si.com
When you say:Pernell: Does Scott Frost Deserve a Fifth Season at Nebraska?
Anything worse than a 2-2 finish could force Trev Alberts’ handwww.si.com
I wouldn’t bet on him winning more than one of the last four.If he wins 3 of 4 yes if not no.
NoPernell: Does Scott Frost Deserve a Fifth Season at Nebraska?
Anything worse than a 2-2 finish could force Trev Alberts’ handwww.si.com
If we go 3-1 he will post a 6-6 record with the #2 toughest ranked schedule in the league, adn will be here next year for sure. If not, all bets are off IMO. I would like to see him retained.Does he deserve to be retained? Not with this record. Four years is way more than enough time to get to a winning record and a bowl game or two, particularly since the Administration and SF himself touted championships as the goal and "watch out for us next year" the year he started. NU is not paying him $5 million a year to lose more than half his games in each of the four seasons he has been head coach. You can get lots of coaches that can do that for a whole lot less money.
The only thing that would mitigate in his favor is upsetting Ohio State. The other games are just games. Even then, his record would be dismal.
Will he be retained? A different question.
When you say:
"They continue to turn the ball over at an alarming rate; Nebraska has fumbled 89 times (lost 38) and thrown 32 picks in 40 Frost-coached games."
This year, we turn the ball over 1.1 times a game (and force 1.3 turnovers a game). Last year we turned it over 2.3 times a game and forced .9 a game (the two previous years, it was 1.8 TOs per game we gave away).
The 1.1 TOs per game ranks us around #40 for fewest per game nationwide this year, with a drastic improvement from last year & previous averages. It was previously a significant issue, but you think it's accurate to say that a stat where we've literally cut mistakes by more than half & are now in the top 1/3 of the country "continues (to be) alarming"?