You have to keep in mind the guy that quoted we are 12th in offense also said the only stat that counts is the scoreboardAnd 106th in red zone offense, 96th in sacks allowed, 30th in efficiency, and 50th in scoring.
C
You have to keep in mind the guy that quoted we are 12th in offense also said the only stat that counts is the scoreboardAnd 106th in red zone offense, 96th in sacks allowed, 30th in efficiency, and 50th in scoring.
C
I think we’ve all been saying that, it has to change, and soon, since 2019, and it’s now 2021 and it still hasn’t changed. Hell, we could be saying it again in 2022.We will.
We'll likely not have long to celebrate.
Make no mistake. Even the most supportive amongst us (and I count myself among that group) are on a shot clock.
It has to change. It has to change soon.
Yesterday Unsportsmanlike Conduct gave analysis of FBS coaches since 1971.
In those 50 years 705 coaches total were at the same school 4+ years.
105 got their 5th year with 0 winning seasons, 0 bowl appearances, less than .390 win %. If NU has a losing record this year Frost is in that group.
Of those 105 only 14 ever had a winning season at that school.
Of those 14 only 2 went on to have a career record over .500 at that school. Stolz at Bowling Green snd Schiano at Rutgers.
Only 4 ever finished a season at that school ranked in the top 25. Schiano at Rutgers, Corso at Indiana, Cutcliffe at Duke and McCarney at Iowa State. They each had one season where they finished top 25.
None of those coaches ever went on to finish in the top 10.
Will Frost get another year? Yes.
If he doesn’t win two more games does he deserve it? Guess it’s in how you define “deserve”. NU would be banking on him to be a coaching turnaround story like college football hasn’t seen in the last 50 years.
I agree but that’s not my point. Go back and read what my point was. It’s pretty easy to understand.Instead of relying on refs maybe AM should just go down after getting the first instead of wasting precious seconds under 2 minutes to go and risking ball security, just to try and get one extra yard. That is like pop warner level crap. Get the first, go down, stop the clock, and get to the line for the next play.
C
You are correct. So so many people looked at the Illinois game as the most important game of the year. It set the tone of the year. You can agree or not but so many posters stated it.
They aren’t scoring, making it a mute point. Getting lots of yards between the 20’s, but can’t score. That, is a problem. A team that ranks 12th in total yards, but is 50th in scoring, is a joke. How does that even happen?The Nebraska offense ranks 12th in the nation in total offense. Some joke.
It is. It’s a mirage built mostly on big plays. They can’t score. Yards don’t count as points.I was responding to the statement that the offense was a "joke". Try reading.
It is. It’s a mirage built mostly on big plays. They can’t score. Yards don’t count as points.
One of the best sports articles I have ever read. An absolute masterpiece on a very divisive topic. Great research, logic, commentary - you thoroughly covered all the bases here and backed every bit of it up with hard stats. You are truly talented as a writer!!Pernell: Does Scott Frost Deserve a Fifth Season at Nebraska?
Anything worse than a 2-2 finish could force Trev Alberts’ handwww.si.com
I think we’ve all been saying that, it has to change, and soon, since 2019, and it’s now 2021 and it still hasn’t changed. Hell, we could be saying it again in 2022.
Didn't you say, rather forcefully, that the only stat that matters is the final score?I was responding to the statement that the offense was a "joke". Try reading.
I don't know who this guy Pernell is but good posters like for example, N2FL, could eat his lunch, analytically.
They've been selling hope for four years now and right now that crap is in the 90% off clearance bin at Dollar General.I get that analysis, and there is plenty of evidence to make that conclusion. Right now, all Frost and his bosses can sell is hope. If the last few games go poorly, that hope will be fighting against even more evidence supporting the contrary.