your disqualified. You think competing with Minnasota is accomplishment even though we lost. That should get you an automatic 24hr vacation.Buck, that point has been made, and though it's astute, it won't be understood by most.
Last edited:
your disqualified. You think competing with Minnasota is accomplishment even though we lost. That should get you an automatic 24hr vacation.Buck, that point has been made, and though it's astute, it won't be understood by most.
Buck, point of fact, he wasn't pleased with Frank during the Notre Dame game that year. You know, when the Huskers were at 25-3 since 2009 (and 34-7 since him taking over).
But what you have to realize is he had a FEELING Frank wasn't the answer.
And that can't have been wrong.
there is a lack of quality wins because you downplay any win
just like the examples of wins Bo has over top 20 teams
granted, there aren't enough, but the reason those aren't ranked higher is they have that additional loss to NU because we got the win
similar to how TO finished vs Ou & Ga Tech
I bet you were pretty confident you knew a LOT back then, too
You're showing your true colors
If you couldn't be pleased by Frank after '01, you were almost impossible to please
depends, if he finishes 9-3 and doesnt go to Indy, he may get canned. It might also depend on how the team loses number 3. There are other factors at play here that don't have anything to do with wins and losses. None of us know for sure what the real result of tape gate really has. Admin can say what they want mid season about that already being delt with with T.O.I guess marquee wins is the new excuse. I have serious qualms about Bo right now, but IF he finishes the regular season 9-3 and gets canned, Nebraska will justifiably be viewed by potential replacements as a toxic environment.
Personally I'm guessing 7-5, and that will get him fired.
not true. I didnt down play them in the sense that I base quality wins by the end of the season rank of the teams you beat? Isnt that logical way to do it?
I'm sensing the tide has dramatically turned on your stance (??????????)... maybe I need to catch up!
which stance?
your disqualified. You think competing with Minnasota is accomplishment even though we lost. That should get you an automatic 24hr vacation.
Not true, just because many are not foolhardy enough to go crowing about how great we are when we win games we are heavily favored to win, doesn't mean we don't appreciate solid wins. We are saddled with a weak schedule in a weak conference so there aren't many opportunities for solid or good wins...and recently, well, there just haven't been but a few. Every solid win seems matched by a much more memorable blowout on national telecasts.
The one where you loved me more than life itself.
so you cant bring yourself to answer the question. lol....nice. Let me ask it like this since you are getting squeezed into a corner. Would a Missouri fan take greater pride had they beat the 97' team or the 07' team? come on, it wont kill you to admit it. They are going with the 97' team. Its not that I can't appreciate the win vs OSU. i celebrated like a 8 year old. I was pumped. A win is a win but if your going to point to that game as a great feat like beating the undefeated team the next year with their best player healthy, then you are not being honest.whiners downplay NU victories over Mich & OSU because they lost there qb
of course, when NU loses an AA lineman, and qb plays crippled, they aren't so understanding of the injury excuse...
Nothing but another season of infighting over the "quality of the wins and losses."
I am quickly remembering why I left the board for a year.
You don't think the UGA game last year was competitive?
Leading at half against UCLA and losing a fairly close (one possession here or there) game to Minnesota isn't competitive?
We may not be winning enough, but we aren't noncompetitive this year.
Your [sic] wrong, as that's not what I said at all.
But keep on misunderstanding.