Lets remember BH also had some excellent classes so it's not all that difficult to recruit to UM imo. JH has had or will have 4 out of 5 recruiting classes in the Top 10. Lets contrast to say WI? Or yes Nebraska the past 15 years? There's been a steady diet of excellent talent and top 10 classes at UM as opposed to recuriting at Nebraska. OSU fired some pretty good coaches because they couldn't beat MU? So there is that to consider because it's almost like an unwritten law for coaches of those respective programs.
Michigan shouldn't lose to unranked teams with the talent glut they enjoy imo. Don't see that as a great accomplishment that many other good coaches couldn't maintain at UM. Most program have down years.. oh except Bama. Not saying JH is a terrible coach but right now he's close to being on the outside looking in. On the other hand 15 million buy out is a pretty steep even for UM.
I'm not advocating firing JH because I could not care less who their coach is to be honest. Give HCSF the same talent that MU has and I'd bet on better results. Obviously that comment is colored because SF is our coach but I really question if JH is the coach that's going to start winning the Big 10... thus beating OSU.
You don't see beating the teams you should, all of them, as a great accomplishment. Hmmm. Well that's something Frost hasn't achieved yet. Not even close.
The road to the Big 10 Championship goes through OSU. And Michigan is 2 and 15 against them the past 17 years.
Michigan doesn't lose to unranked teams, so I'm not sure what you meant by that.
Are you saying that if Nebraska had Michigan's talent they wouldn't be losing to unranked teams? Um, Nebraska has plenty of talent to maintain that expectation.
Not sure about your claim that Ohio St. has fired coaches (that's plural btw) because they couldn't beat Michigan.
Going back to the year after Woody Hayes 1979. Obviously Woody Hayes wasn't fired for losing to Michigan.
1979 Earl Bruce. Beat Michigan 1st year. was 5-4 against Michigan overall.
1988 John Cooper. He went 2-1-10 against Michigan. Ouch. Took him 6 years to win 10 games and 8 years to win 11. From 1995 to 1998 went 43-7 overall. But was 1-4 against Michigan during that time. Michigan was pretty good then as well, especially 1997.
Tressel 2001. was 9-1 against Michigan.
2012 Urban Meyer 6-0 vs. Michigan.
So I don't see support for multiple coaches being fired for not beating Michigan. Cooper is the closest. But he coached from 1998 to 2000. That's a heck of a lot of time to finally decide he couldn't beat Michigan. Not the 5 years Michigan is giving Harbaugh right about now.
Seems like overall ( I could be way off) you are of the opinion that recruiting to Michigan is a given. And since they have consistently great recruiting classes, it's a given they should never lose to an unranked team. In addition, winning 10 games 3 out of 4 years isn't good enough. Beating their biggest rival OSU, who is out recruiting them, is the ultimate measure. Not winning bowl games, not beating every team they should. Not blowing out teams. Not building an attractive and successful program.
Tom Osborne lost 6 straight to Oklahoma. He also lost 4 strait. Overall record vs Oklahoma 13-13.
Right now very few teams are beating Ohio State. So I don't hold it against harbaugh right now.
I just find it pretty ridiculous to even consider a 10 win coach on the hot seat. I especially find it comical that any Nebraska fan would be the least bit critical of Harbaugh. We haven't exactly overachieved with our Top 25 talent.
Logic. If harbaugh should finish in the Top 10 because they have Top 10 talent, then where should Nebraska finish? Hint. We have Top 25 talent.
We seem to have some double standards when it comes to Frost.