Also, the suggestion that the system is broken or should be changed is silly. Had Nebraska not been a total sh*t-show last season, they would have only had to scratch off 18 wins to dance as their schedule was brutally tough. In 2014 we danced with 19 wins because our schedule was tough and we had some good wins. Things just didn’t break right this year. Next year will probably be much different.
There are minor things I’d like to change, I think RPI can be manipulated too easily. I also think the committee can do a better job selecting and explaining bubble teams, they contradict themselves a lot. It is a subjective process still in a lot of ways, common sense should have removed Syracuse and Oklahoma. I don’t give a damn about their RPI, Oklahoma State should have replaced one of those teams. It’s all about big wins, right?
There are minor things I’d like to change, I think RPI can be manipulated too easily. I also think the committee can do a better job selecting and explaining bubble teams, they contradict themselves a lot. It is a subjective process still in a lot of ways, common sense should have removed Syracuse and Oklahoma. I don’t give a damn about their RPI, Oklahoma State should have replaced one of those teams. It’s all about big wins, right?