Ignorant posts like these are why I signed up.
What is the "benefit" to be a walkon?
Lolwut?Meant to quote this. "What's the benefit" is such troll post. Here's some food, ya troll
Why can't we just let woman walk on for the football program?
Well if it opens opportunities.....Didn't the Puffaloes try that a few years back? IIRC, it didn't work out so well...
Not so sure ... John Cook has 14 players on his roster. 12 are on scholarship. He might not want 3 more players because (a) might make practicing with that many difficult and (b) the talent drop-off is probably extremely significant between #12 and #15There are 12 women’s teams. Simply adding 3-4 more walk-ons per team over time gets us to that number. As Frost has said, it won’t be done right away. But to give the coaches for women’s sports the green light to grab 3-4 more worthy players, my assumption is they would be all about it, and their programs would benefit as well.
- academic support, scheduling and counselingOpportunies for:
- playing time, which could lead to a professional career
- training from top caliber college coaching staff
- competition with scholarship players
- greater access to facilities
- can eat at training table (though they may have to buy their meals).
- realizing lifelong dream for some
- greater access to college babes than the ordinary schmoe.
I could not disagree with this more. If nothing else the extra players can be used in drills to block and dig. I coached a fairly successful HS Volley ball team here in MD and our unit team in the Marine Corps. On Both I had 25 - 30 people. The HS team had one assistant. I believe that JC has 4. I do not think adding 3 will hurt him. The potential upside of finding a late bloomer far outshines the negatives. Add to that the fact that girls in most sports have no illusions of going pro and making millions. So far fewer egos to stroke.Not so sure ... John Cook has 14 players on his roster. 12 are on scholarship. He might not want 3 more players because (a) might make practicing with that many difficult and (b) the talent drop-off is probably extremely significant between #12 and #15
Lacrosse as well.I am telling you guys, at womens field hockey, it is already a big 10 sport, and it is cheap, who cares if they are not good. There is about 20 right there.
The good news is, Cook won’t be told to do anything. He can do whatever he wants and Moos will find another way.Not so sure ... John Cook has 14 players on his roster. 12 are on scholarship. He might not want 3 more players because (a) might make practicing with that many difficult and (b) the talent drop-off is probably extremely significant between #12 and #15
But won't the women just be a distraction?
Is "opportunities" the key word?
I mean if we say "We want 100 new women's team walkons. Come and sign up!"
But when they don't get that many to actually come and sign up and put in the effort, at least they had the opportunity?