Easy to like a post that says pretty much what I posted just a few seconds after I posted it...Like minds.Squeaky wheel sets the precedence, which Dixon could subsequently follow.
Last edited:
Easy to like a post that says pretty much what I posted just a few seconds after I posted it...Like minds.Squeaky wheel sets the precedence, which Dixon could subsequently follow.
When in doubt, the NCAA can usually be counted on to do the wrong thing.
Totally agree. Seen it happen too many times.I am not going to count my chickens just yet. As noted, Patterson had a pushy attorney making various claims. The NCAA may decide those were specific circumstances that don't apply across the board. When in doubt, the NCAA can usually be counted on to do the wrong thing.
So if Dixon’s eligibility is denied, will a Nebraska attorney represent him and appeal?
No way, all Nebraska attorneys are forthright, honest and upstanding...they'd have no chance.So if Dixon’s eligibility is denied, will a Nebraska attorney represent him and appeal?
Mhm. I don't see any way they rule Patterson eligible and not Dixon. I think that would make some people very... um... upset.Squeaky wheel sets the precedence, which Dixon could subsequently follow.
You are probably in for a long sleep.GBR.wake me when ncaa dose something logical
I am not going to count my chickens just yet. As noted, Patterson had a pushy attorney making various claims. The NCAA may decide those were specific circumstances that don't apply across the board. When in doubt, the NCAA can usually be counted on to do the wrong thing.