He's not.
-
You do not need to register if you are not going to pay the yearly fee to post. If you register please click here or log in go to "settings" then "my account" then "User Upgrades" and you can renew.
HuskerMax readers can save 50% on Omaha Steaks .
Vedral is FAST!
- Thread starter AzHusker
- Start date
He's not.
Yep. I don't think anyone in this thread has said that he was.
But he is FAST
Last edited:
As would I. And if that happens, it's a good thing - likely it means we have a lead, and the coaches can show trust in some of the 2's.
D
Deleted member 3889
Guest
Of course he's fast. He comes from that good West River 605 stock.
You won’t get roasted by me, I posed the question a couple weeks ago whether it might not help AM to see a series or two from the sidelines when the offense began to stall.
Managing a QB is a different animal, apparently. Any other position, guys rotate all the time, but not QB, at least the way Frost/Verduzco handle it.
IMO we are starting to see what Adrian can do now. That drive at the end of the first half last week was a thing of beauty. Barring injury, I highly doubt Scott would start Vedral. Hopefully there will be more opps for him to get in - games that we feel in control of.
You have never heard the phrase the if you have 2 starting quarterbacks you have no starting QB. Even TO only played one game. (94 Orange Bowl) without a clear starter. Going into 95 season he stated the TFraz was the starter. No coach in his right mind would do what you all are suggesting.
ShortSideOption
Guest
My how things have changed on this site. Went from me telling people Vedral was good and don’t let the spring stats and minimal game stats fool you, to now people advocating to start him over Martinez.
Like I said Tom: the quarterback is too spessshhhul. Too fragile to be treated like the other players.
Slow discussion day on here, apparently. Just to clarify, two people on this thread were “wondering” about the QB situation.
The “people advocating starting Vedral over Martinez” thread must be somewhere else (and I missed it).
You're not following the 'Backup QB is always the better option' rule.
I'm not sure what number the rule is, but it's been around a long, long time.
Backups playing significant time in multiple games throughout a season is part of what made Nebraska a dominant team back in the day and has been sorely missed for years.
