And as the OP you have contributed nothing to said thread. I have discussed the weaknesses and asked what you would replace his scheme with that could work. What's so hard about understanding and contributing instead of just crying and being ignorant?
I asked for evidence that he was a top notch DC, and all you’ve done is provide excuses for poor results.
OK bud. Have a nice day. Sheesh.
I answered your question with Season 1 at UCF....You haven't responded to mine....I'll wait.....
You think his first year at UCF was evidence that he’s a top notch DC?
There's more....turnover margin year 2. Performance against one of the top runningbacks in the nation in the bowl game. Please feel free to address my points about what scheme would work with this personnel in your post after the game. That's typically how logical discussions go. Point-counterpoint from both sides.
I greatly look forward to your response.
Quick add though, it’s remarkable that finishing 113th in total defense is evidence that you’re a top notch DC.
Quick response...it's remarkable that you can exclude factors that play into stats and manipulate them, especially when a coach is handicapped by personnel and use that to prove someone is bad. You must have thought Saban was garbage as MSU as well and would never pan out. Or Belicheck with the Browns. lol football ignorance at it's finest
More excuses, ignoring anything that doesn’t support your agenda, and zero evidence that he’s a top notch dc.
Don't bother man.
I haven't ignored any point you've made. I've addressed them with why I feel his schemes works, along with previous tenures of success. You continue to provide zero evidence of what scheme would work with this. You also keep deflecting the external factors (time of possession/secondary youth/personnel issues that currently exist).
