Well I’ll address this in order. What do you mean is anyone disputing it? You did. You are still disputing that it was illegal to do it and film it.Why would the Pennsylvania police ask Scroggins for her side of the story as it relates to the shenanigans of the team members obtaining a key and entering the room? To determine whether they entered the room under those pretenses? Is anyone disputing that.
How many people knew of these shenanigans at the time? Why didn’t they call the police (assuming a whole bunch of things)? Someone uninvolved reports that 2 team members engaged in shenanigans and gained access to a room that wasn’t theirs, and the person whose room it was did not notify or call the police. No other report of anything. Yeah, the cops ain’t coming.
We’ve had the conversation before about your tendency to assign positions to people that aren’t being taken by them. Do you want to revisit it?
Speaking of rumors, a guy heard at the Village Inn that the relationship was voluntary entered to get more playing time, and when it was discovered, it became obvious that the playing time, on and off the court, was ending. The whole thing is nutt’n more than a scorched earth retribution.
Are we taking that rumor to the bank too?
We had a conversation about assigning positions? Sorry nothing about any conversations with you sticks in my mind.
As far as your Village Inn rumour. Well I wish you would offer some substance to it so I can use it to support my theory on what happened. But whether they did it voluntarily or not is only a part of it and likely not the part the University is concerned about. It’s how they handled it. The lawsuit spells much of it out as I pointed out.