I have to believe the system in place was adequate, it just wasn't followed. But that's for others to sort out.
-
You do not need to register if you are not going to pay the yearly fee to post. If you register please click here or log in go to "settings" then "my account" then "User Upgrades" and you can renew.
HuskerMax readers can save 50% on Omaha Steaks .
Been avoiding this but finally spilling my thoughts.
- Thread starter Hville
- Start date
- Status
Not speaking for @Hville, but there was an article published (I don't have the link) that outlined some of the serious infractions such as he described, also about a team meeting in which Scoggins was basically slut-shamed by the team with the coach present. When was Trev notified and what actions did he take are good questions.
I think when I was refering to the system I was referring to Trev not following it.
Former Nebraska women's player sues university, alleges grooming
The lawsuit lists Chuck Love, head coach Amy Williams, athletic director Trev Alberts and the Nebraska school of regents as defendants.
theathletic.com
In February 2022, the lawsuit states team members caught and videotaped Scoggin in Love’s hotel room in State College, Pa., after a practice player tricked a hotel desk clerk into giving him Love’s room key. After showing the video recording to Williams, the lawsuit states that the coach took no measures to protect Scoggin’s confidentiality and “took no measures to meaningfully explore whether what had been reported to her was the result of an abuse of power, ethics and status by Love.”
for the record. I too believe it is likely settled out of court. I just gotta believe with him gone the University will try to rinse.....not wash their hands of the situation a little easier. Not cheaper.......just easier.
Oh, those broken laws. Faking close relations to coach Love, illegal entry, likely illegal taping.Former Nebraska women's player sues university, alleges grooming
The lawsuit lists Chuck Love, head coach Amy Williams, athletic director Trev Alberts and the Nebraska school of regents as defendants.
In February 2022, the lawsuit states team members caught and videotaped Scoggin in Love’s hotel room in State College, Pa., after a practice player tricked a hotel desk clerk into giving him Love’s room key. After showing the video recording to Williams, the lawsuit states that the coach took no measures to protect Scoggin’s confidentiality and “took no measures to meaningfully explore whether what had been reported to her was the result of an abuse of power, ethics and status by Love.”
I get it now.
I only hope they were fully clothed. If not and they showed that tape to anyone.......ouch.
Whoever on that team.....the Uni may end up taking one for them.
Published articles don't mean much. Allegations contained in complaints are simply allegations, not facts. There's no information in the complaint that the "practice player went into the room, and I'm still waiting for the answer for what and when the police should have been called.
Not sure how a protected article answers any questions. It doesn't. There's no allegation in the complaint that the practice player went into the room. There's no assertion in what you quoted that the practice player went into the room. Also waiting for the answer for what and when the police should have been called. And, which police.Former Nebraska women's player sues university, alleges grooming
The lawsuit lists Chuck Love, head coach Amy Williams, athletic director Trev Alberts and the Nebraska school of regents as defendants.
In February 2022, the lawsuit states team members caught and videotaped Scoggin in Love’s hotel room in State College, Pa., after a practice player tricked a hotel desk clerk into giving him Love’s room key. After showing the video recording to Williams, the lawsuit states that the coach took no measures to protect Scoggin’s confidentiality and “took no measures to meaningfully explore whether what had been reported to her was the result of an abuse of power, ethics and status by Love.”
Last edited:
What makes you believe the system in place wasn't followed?
Since this was posted in the Rumor forum, I felt it unecessary to prefix "alleged" to every action. I can do that for you, if you wish, but I'm confident you'll be able to mentally do that yourself. No one knows the facts, but information published by a respectable source is fair game for discussion, whether or not you like it.
As I said, that's for others to sort out, which you allegedly chose to ignore.
Maybe judge Heresay will get the case
You respond to a post asking specific questions, including sources for certain statements (that were not contained in the complaint or any other article) and also asking what cops should be called and for what crime, and want to go down a tangent of allegations rather than sources for the allegations and other statements? That's interesting. Nutt'n to do with what I like or don't. But assertions not based on 'fact' or factual allegations don't help, and statements about calling the cops in the context of what is going on are ill informed. Whether you like it or not...discussion of actual facts and asserted facts is important...references to unestablished facts and factual allegations not made only serves to dumb the discussion down. It was stated as a fact that the the other practice player went into the room. First time I'd heard or read that allegation. Asking for the source of that allegation should be fair game...but apparently not.
You believe the system didn't work (wasn't followed), but can't explain the basis of that belief? Normal peeps would question their beliefs if they can't explain them, rather than relying on others to explain their beliefs. You seem to be ignoring your statement that the system wasn't followed, but waiting for others to tell you how it wasn't. That is a bold strategy.
Last edited:
Obviously, you're a better person than me.
GBR
- Status
