That’s not a slippery slope argument. If UCLAs bowl game is meaningless, all of their games were meaningless.
That slope is not only slippery, but greased to beat hell.
Last edited:
That’s not a slippery slope argument. If UCLAs bowl game is meaningless, all of their games were meaningless.
I guess if the bowl games are meaningless lets get rid of them.I've come around on it for someone that is a top round draft pick, in a meaningless bowl game. Risking millions and starting your NFL career off trying to rehab and not be yourself. That being said, if we start seeing people sitting out the CFP or things like that, I would worry.
However, we've had players from Nebraska (not necessarily in football) fake injuries and what not to help preserve their draft status and money. It's happened for a lot longer than people know.
Didn't Texas have three players sit the game last night? They had like 8 or 9 overall that didn't play, but I thought I'd heard that there chose to sit out and not risk injury.I was listening to ESPN radio last night and they were discussing this. Christian McCaffery is the high profile bowl defector last year, and the feeling was that this could be a widespread practice of the blue-chippers. But they said that it really hasn't happened that much. Josh Allen at Wyoming played last week, and others have and will.
Sitting out a playoff bowl leading to the NC is one thing. Skipping the Bad Boys Mower Bowl or Poulon Weedeater Bowl is another.
Back in the 70s, the NFL annually had a college all-star team (just graduated and ready to go pro) play the Chicago Bears just before camps opened up. Talk about a risk. I had a friend back then who was All-American LB from Arizona, and when invited, he told them he didn't want to play in it because of the injury potential, and was cussed out so bad by the committee that he relented and played. Got beat up in the game, but not enough to keep him from going pro. Notice they don't play that game any more.
Nah, that would be too much work for most kids to walk over to my lawn...hard to get a kid to leave the house and the video game.I think there's a kid on your lawn. You should go check it out.
Meaningless to the player and meaningless to the team are two separate arguments, you can't lump them both together like you are trying to do with that statement. It's like everything in life, some things are more beneficial to others. If you are trying to convince me that the Cactus bowl is meaningful to Josh Rosen when they are 6-6, you will never win. However, UCLA as a team absolutely enjoyed being able to have extra bowl practices and play one more time. Very meaningful to the Bruins and to Chip Kelly to assess his team. Not meaningful at all to Rosen.I guess if the bowl games are meaningless lets get rid of them.
I guess if the bowl games are meaningless lets get rid of them.
If we've reached the point the only thing worthwhile or meaningful for some players is playing it safe for the $$$$ NFL draft we've pretty much hit "rock bottom" IMO. There actually are people that aren't 100% driven by $$$$ and I'm lucky to have served and worked with many of them in the military and law enforcement. I'm part of my team until I'm no longer part of my team... period. Yea I know that's old fashioned and not in vogue today... but I'm to old to change!Meaningless to the player and meaningless to the team are two separate arguments, you can't lump them both together like you are trying to do with that statement. It's like everything in life, some things are more beneficial to others. If you are trying to convince me that the Cactus bowl is meaningful to Josh Rosen when they are 6-6, you will never win. However, UCLA as a team absolutely enjoyed being able to have extra bowl practices and play one more time. Very meaningful to the Bruins and to Chip Kelly to assess his team. Not meaningful at all to Rosen.
I guess that is my beef. When its important to the team......and not to the individual. In a team sport Id have a hard time drafting him to the next level.Meaningless to the player and meaningless to the team are two separate arguments, you can't lump them both together like you are trying to do with that statement. It's like everything in life, some things are more beneficial to others. If you are trying to convince me that the Cactus bowl is meaningful to Josh Rosen when they are 6-6, you will never win. However, UCLA as a team absolutely enjoyed being able to have extra bowl practices and play one more time. Very meaningful to the Bruins and to Chip Kelly to assess his team. Not meaningful at all to Rosen.
I think NFL teams look at it if the guy is sitting out the CFP or something like that. I hated this trend when it started, but I can understand why an individual does it. Jaylon Smith's injury in his bowl game cost him nearly 15 million per year. I ain't risking that if i'm Rosen, and I would understand as a teammate.I guess that is my beef. When its important to the team......and not to the individual. In a team sport Id have a hard time drafting him to the next level.
I think NFL teams look at it if the guy is sitting out the CFP or something like that. I hated this trend when it started, but I can understand why an individual does it. Jaylon Smith's injury in his bowl game cost him nearly 15 million per year. I ain't risking that if i'm Rosen, and I would understand as a teammate.
I'm not a big fan of Rosen but I actually liked and agreed for the most part about what he was saying about players missing bowl games, especially meaningless ones.
FWIW, I actually think he would've played had he not been dealing with lingering concussion issues. I don't think he sat out to protect himself
They've always been meaningless.I guess if the bowl games are meaningless lets get rid of them.