So you are saying this isn't your greatest thread? Where do you think it ranks?
-
You do not need to register if you are not going to pay the yearly fee to post. If you register please click here or log in go to "settings" then "my account" then "User Upgrades" and you can renew.
HuskerMax readers can save 50% on Omaha Steaks .
Coach Walters talks offense & QB development
- Thread starter Paramus
- Start date
- Status
I never think about stuff like that. I am too busy admiring your threads. They are the Greatest Threads of All.
Last edited:
How exactly can someone interpret recruiting rankings in a way that can in any way measure how close a guy is to being classified as another type of player? Is there something out there that says player X is a pro-style passer, but if he had run for 50 more yards as a senior, we would rate him as a DT QB??
rive:
Yep. Given basic ball skills and decent athleticism, I almost think it’s the mental characteristics that will decide a qb’s success in this system. Quick thinking, competitive as heck, mentally tough, turnover avoidant.
I thought it was interesting that SF was one of the only coaches who offered that Matthew Tago a chance to compete at QB if he committed. Tago would have been more of a “fullback at qb” like SF has referred to himself in the past. I would think that a Scott Frost and a T. Frazier both would have excelled in this offense (as well as Jamaal Lord, Crouch, Berringer).
But you are right, the Qb drives the whole machine. Can’t wait to see it all shake out.
That's hard to believe given your past history of bragging on threads reaching 200 replies and 10,000 views. I noticed that you spent the better part of three weeks continually trying to pump life into your "New Idea" thread. I got a lot of yuks out of that thread. I think that you could do the same with this thread if you work hard enough.
BTW, I was serious earlier about this being your best thread, but I guess you weren't looking for a compliment, just a way to fuel more posts and views.
Last edited:
And I was serious about your Mike Riley praise threads. I thought they were your best threads. I am surprised nobody agreed with me.
I guess many thought that your Bo Pelini knuckle dragger threads were your best.
Solesrfr pretends to place great value in supporting a sitting HC. Did he ever chastise you for not supporting Coach Pelini?
Last edited:
They were outstanding threads though ultimately they proved to be wrong and nothing more than a bunch of sunshine pumping. In just a few months, I'll get started with some interesting SF sunshine pumping threads.
Since you edited your post and included me I will answer. My favorite was when I hit him with this gem.
C
Last edited:
Missed this earlier, but I never called Bo a knuckle dragger...I called him a lot of other things, but not that.
Last edited:
It appears SF's tendency is to go with the QBs who have the best running ability - - Holman, Milton & Patti in 2016 - - Milton and Vedral in 2017. Base on that tendency, I predict the post-spring depth chart will be:
1. Martinez
2. Gebbia
3. Andrew Bunch
4. O'Brien
Combined, I think NU has more running and passing ability at QB than UCF had in 2016, but that is not saying a whole lot.[/QUOTE]
You seriously think if O'Brien is behind Andrew Bunch at the end of spring ball he will even be on the "post-spring depth chart?"
1. Martinez
2. Gebbia
3. Andrew Bunch
4. O'Brien
Combined, I think NU has more running and passing ability at QB than UCF had in 2016, but that is not saying a whole lot.[/QUOTE]
You seriously think if O'Brien is behind Andrew Bunch at the end of spring ball he will even be on the "post-spring depth chart?"
Did you see Bunch run?
- Status
