No, you're just on ignore.You were gone?
No, you're just on ignore.You were gone?
Thom beat me to some of it in the quotation below, but you answered your own question: a lot of the quicker DEs of the McBride era would have been recruited to play OLB, and for the same reasons. The guy that I thought of earlier as a DE from that era who would be an OLB in Chin's system is Duane Harris. Remember him? Every one of those DEs with long arms and a good burst of speed would have been reshaped into OLBs. It was good for Wistrom and Nebraska that we were playing a 4-3 because he probably didn't move laterally well enough to be as dominant as an OLB.
Nebraska has always had a lot of players at the size required to play OLB, but the problem is that they have to also have the quickness and nose for the ball necessary to move around in space and still make plays.
That's the most popular thing on the internet!MABC I am really not sure what we are arguing about. [...]
I think we are talking about 2 different things.
Like you, and most everybody else I have opinions. We all have a right to them, we also have the right to not be offended. I won't give anybody power over myself. If I don't like it I just ignore it. I won't be offended.I can't quit you guys. Even tho it took a vacation of someone else to get me back.
@NUinID , yes, I said in my first response that I agreed with all that you had said except for the part about it being easier to recruit to the 4-3, which is where everything else came from. I didn't think that we were "arguing."
I dont think we argue. What do you think about that?We’re always arguing.
It’s what we do.
I dont think we argue. What do you think about that?