This is the best slant I have seen on the nine win argument which seems to be the source of contention on here. As Shatel points out nine is just a number not always equating to a good season. The Bo believers will have you believe this cannot be a bad season if we win nine games whereas the opposition points out that with the quality of our opposition it does not mean a lot. Shatel goes thru past Husker nine win seasons that were an accomplishment and some that were not all that good of seasons. He points out a couple nine win seasons during Tom's tenure that caused Tom to make changes in offense, defense and recruiting. With Bo we have gotten more of we won nine games so all is well. As he points out its quality not quantity in that its if you maxed your talent winning those nine games performing up your ability and got all of the talent you have. As Rojo would say its food for thought.