It's that sleepover thing...It is a pretty good article. Although I do not understand the grading. They gave us an A and Michigan a B even though they finished ahead of us at #11.
It's that sleepover thing...It is a pretty good article. Although I do not understand the grading. They gave us an A and Michigan a B even though they finished ahead of us at #11.
It is a pretty good article. Although I do not understand the grading. They gave us an A and Michigan a B even though they finished ahead of us at #11.
Pretty advantageous that nine of the 23 signees will be early enrollees:
QB Logan Smothers
WR Alante Brown
OT Turner Corcoran
NG Jordon Riley
LB Blaise Gunnerson
LB Eteva Mauga-Clements
DB Henry Gray
DB Jaiden Francois
DB Tamon Lynum
It is a pretty good article. Although I do not understand the grading. They gave us an A and Michigan a B even though they finished ahead of us at #11.
I took it as more of a, "based on their recruiting history and potential...," power ranking, of sorts.I think that the grades are based on a combination of the needs of the program (and how well the recruits meet that need) and the overall quality of the class. Nebraska needed WRs and DLs, and we brought in a bunch, and the overall quality was high. You could also probably grade how well you did relative to who you were pursuing, so Michigan pursuing a 5-star who goes elsewhere while settling for a 4-star would score lower than Nebraska landing the 4-star that they were pursuing.
My guess is because we still have positions open, and @N2FL has not done his final rankings. I believe there were a ton of stickies last year as well in the Between Times of Recruiting.why is this still a "sticky"? seems like far too many "stickies" in this forum
Who is going to rank the Walk-on Class?
You must be new here.....why is this still a "sticky"? seems like far too many "stickies" in this forum
Lol - Reimer would have been #1 last year and Paup #1 the other year. Not sure people would be happy with that “success” rate.I catch enough grief doing scholarship guys when posters armed with hindsight double back a year or two down the line. I nominate @ShortSideOption
I am. Plus, the number of stickies in this always annoys me. Plus, I dont see the value of this particular thread topic. I appreciate N2FL's analysis of the recruits and his passion but ranking players doesn't make sense to me as they are in different positions.You must be new here.....
Lol - Reimer would have been #1 last year and Paup #1 the other year. Not sure people would be happy with that “success” rate.
Well you could probably just go back to hanging out in the football forum. Someone may appreciate your opinion on the value of thread topics there. I’m sure I am not the minority in this thread that gives a Texas what you think. Thanks for stopping by.I am. Plus, the number of stickies in this always annoys me. Plus, I dont see the value of this particular thread topic. I appreciate N2FL's analysis of the recruits and his passion but ranking players doesn't make sense to me as they are in different positions.