So allow me to toss a wrench in here...Texas and OU to the B1G, Nebraska back to the Big 12 with Mizzoo, aTm, and Colorado.
So allow me to toss a wrench in here...Texas and OU to the B1G, Nebraska back to the Big 12 with Mizzoo, aTm, and Colorado.
So allow me to toss a wrench in here...Texas and OU to the B1G, Nebraska back to the Big 12 with Mizzoo, aTm, and Colorado.
Might be the only way the BIG can get a team in the playoffs. Two step process:
1) break up the Big 12 - take Texas and OU into the BIG
2) Eliminate divisions and eliminate round-robin schedules.
All driven by TV contracts...CFB will suck in 10 years.
Might be the only way the BIG can get a team in the playoffs. Two step process:
1) break up the Big 12 - take OU into the BIG
2) Eliminate divisions and eliminate round-robin schedules.
All driven by TV contracts...CFB will suck in 10 years.
All Delaney cares about is money. Rutgers and maryland were added for money alone...they bring absolutely NOTHING to the conference. The 9 game thing, while i don't ont mind it and I dont think it is a huge disadvantage, is all about TV.
NW winning the west has people from Delaney to @Hville wetting the bed.
I believe "rivalries" were part of the equation in determining the divisions. Hard to satisfy all the concerns in a large conference.
I think it might have made a difference but not sure it would have been enough to keep us there. Just to many sour things with Texas. Keep in mind that had OU probably could have helped protect that game but didn't so they weren't high on our list for voting against us and with Texas on everything too.Yup. And the Big Ten has a ton of rivalry games. You can't swap an east power to the west without then creating a scenario where that team is playing at least 2 protected east rivalries, which jacks up the division schedule.
I do get protecting rivalries though. They are crucial to conference stability. I'm 100% convinced that if the Big 12 powers-that-be had protected the NU vs. OU game, Nebraska never leaves the conference.