Frequently answer posts like what? I was at work at the time and can't write a lengthy response on my phone. You're way off base with me, but I'll give this another try.
My point on Jurgens was that he was a player the staff packed a ton of weight on in a very short period of time....and it worked. I was against it from the get go, as adding that much weight to his frame in that short period of time seemed like a really bad idea. It worked. He wasn't ready to play center when he was handed the position, but by the end of his time at Nebraska, he was a very, very good center. Obviously a failure of the S&C program. I know. (Sarcasm)
You're conflating things, as do many posters, by saying 'The offensive line play was poor and we don't physically dominate, therefore our S&C is the problem.' Those things don't align like so many think they do. There are a lot of football players who aren't even very good S&C guys and still happen to be very good football players. Conversely, there are kids in great S&C programs who aren't very good football players. The two don't always align. When we had elite talent AND the best S&C in the game, we kicked nearly everyone's tail. We don't have close to elite talent anymore and it shows. No amount of S&C in the world will overcome lack of coaching, development, scheme and going against better players.
I know and discuss football. Just because we don't agree on this subject doesn't mean otherwise. I'm not sure what the comments about semantics or logic come from, but whatever.
Let me know if that makes more sense.
