I was two so I will take your word for it.
I was two so I will take your word for it.
I said the 83 team because of how they dominated everyone except Oklahoma State and eventually Miami. Having the triplets together at one time was the most talent I ever saw on an offensive team at Nebraska. The more I think about it though the more I agree with you that that 93 team was more balanced and very good both offensively and defensively.This is a really tough decision. For me it's between 1982, 1983, 1993, and 1999. (Duh, I just looked closer at the poll and I see that those are the top 4 finishers).
1982 - Robbed of the title by the refs against PSU.
1983 - The defense was too weak and defense wins championships.
1993 - Robbed of the title by the refs against FSU.
1999 - Self-inflicted wounds doomed them. So many fumbles!
That leaves me with 1982 and 1993 because both teams already earned the national championship but were just robbed of it by the refs. I'm going to bet on Tommie Frazier and our AD Trev...
So then my answer is 1993 Nebraska. The 60-3 run started with that team.
I was two so I will take your word for it.
But the '93 team was a missed 2-pt PAT away from losing to KU. No "best" team does that. Ever.My vote is for the 1993 team. In the national championship game ('94 Orange Bowl), +17.5 point underdog & then undefeated #2 Nebraska was the better team most of the game. The Huskers still had an opportunity to pull it out on the final play of the game but a 45 yard FGA was wide left. As much as anything, poor officiating (phantom flag negating Corey Dixon's punt return TD; no call on the goal line fumble on William Floyd's TD) allowed #1 FSU to escape with the 18-16 scoreboard win. #1 FSU was led by Hyped-man Trophy winner QB Charlie Ward, who decided he was better suited for the NBA rather than the NFL. Good call.
1999 -- The team lost at #18 Texas 20-24. Yes, it avenged the loss with a win in the Big XII Championship but keep in mind the Longhorns finished the season with 3 straight losses, ending up a meh 9-5. In other words, a bad, bad loss. In addition, the Huskers needed overtime to eek out a 33-30 win at unranked Colorado (7-5). Enough said.
1996 -- 2 losses (at ASU, Texas in the Big XII Championship), including 0-19 at Arizona State. Texas finished the season with an even more meh 8-5 record. NFW -- you know, Not Friggin' Worthy, or something like that.
1983 -- No "best" team trails 0-17 in a game. Ever.
1982 -- Good argument for this team being the best non-title Nebraska team. Had replay been around, the Huskers might have held on and defeated Penn State (and perhaps played Georgia in the Sugar Bowl for the NC). Alas, this team barely beat LSU in the Orange Bowl (21-20); the Tigers had lost to Tulane (4-7) -- in Baton Rouge -- the prior game. Tulane. Yikes.
1972 -- 2 losses (at UCLA, home against Oklahoma) and a gift tie (at Iowa State). Remind me why is this even an option?
1965 -- Outside of Missouri and perhaps Colorado, Nebraska played a very weak schedule. A 28-39 loss to Alabama in the Orange Bowl doesn't help.
But the '93 team was a missed 2-pt PAT away from losing to KU. No "best" team does that. Ever.
Prior to the Orange Bowl the '93 Husker's had a laughably weak schedule. Outside of FSU everyone had at least three losses, and CU finished as the highest ranked team at #17.Lol, fair enough. That being said, let the record reflect '93 Nebraska beat Kansas 21-20, while '83 Nebraska trailed Miami by 17 points in the 1st quarter (0-17) and again in the 4th quarter (17-31) before ultimately losing the game 30-31. As great as the '83 team was on offense, the Husker defense was average at best and slow.
1982 -- Good argument for this team being the best non-title Nebraska team. Had replay been around, the Huskers might have held on and defeated Penn State (and perhaps played Georgia in the Sugar Bowl for the NC). Alas, this team barely beat LSU in the Orange Bowl (21-20); the Tigers had lost to Tulane (4-7) -- in Baton Rouge -- the prior game. Tulane. Yikes.
For just one play would have liked to have had the Heisman trophy winner in the back field on the 2 point extra point attempt.This is a really tough decision. For me it's between 1982, 1983, 1993, and 1999. (Duh, I just looked closer at the poll and I see that those are the top 4 finishers).
1982 - Robbed of the title by the refs against PSU.
1983 - The defense was too weak and defense wins championships.
1993 - Robbed of the title by the refs against FSU.
1999 - Self-inflicted wounds doomed them. So many fumbles!
That leaves me with 1982 and 1993 because both teams already earned the national championship but were just robbed of it by the refs. I'm going to bet on Tommie Frazier and our AD Trev...
So then my answer is 1993 Nebraska. The 60-3 run started with that team.
The Huskers lost to UCLA not USC in 1972 on the Herran field goal. The NCIS man was the QB for UCLA and then returned to Lincoln the next year in Osborne's first game as head coach 40-13.I would have to go back and look at '99 a little closer. My initial impression is that team would have won it all if given the shot against FSU. And it wasn't on the field as much as VA. Tech taking away our shot.
The CU let up is probably what cost us. We had a dominating lead and impressive win in the bag going into the 4th and blew a 24 point 4th quarter lead. We won the game in OT, but that killed any chance.
Prior to the Orange Bowl the '93 Husker's had a laughably weak schedule. Outside of FSU everyone had at least three losses, and CU finished as the highest ranked team at #17.
In addition to almost losing to 4 win KU (which everyone remembers) the 93 squad almost crapped the bed against a three win OSU team too. We trailed at the half and didn't take the lead until the 4th quarter (on a blocked punt of all things). We ended up winning by 14, but it was a very close game. At least the close games in 82 and 83 were against good teams.
NOTE: Love the '93 squad. But if we are splitting hairs, let's split hairs!
Not just in the bowl game; Ia St lit us up pretty badly.The 1983 Scoring Explosion was a great offensive team. However, the defense was lacking mightily in the bowl game against a team that could air it out and keep you off balanced.
That is why I went with the 1999 team since I feel they were a better “overall” team.