He does have Wisconsin ties, right? But if he isnt available there's also SP.Boy, I would like to recommend his replacement. I'll give y'all two letters ... SE.
He does have Wisconsin ties, right? But if he isnt available there's also SP.Boy, I would like to recommend his replacement. I'll give y'all two letters ... SE.
Co ADsHe does have Wisconsin ties, right? But if he isnt available there's also SP.
Shocker
They lost to a SF recruited qb in that rose bowl.
The passing game, and their slightly disappointing run game,having all those NFL O linemen and Taylor,and now, switching to more a pssing game.
This doesnt benefit Wiscy in the slightest, unless people thing they canbecome the other OSU west.
We outtrushed Wiscy by 34 positions, we finished 28th, they finished 62nd.Last year.
2019, they started to fall off, gaining 40 yds less per game than the previous year, and that was with all those nfl linemen and Taylor, as i said.
Their stats are wobbling if you will, but thats what happened.
Remember, when youre that good,its not that you win, its often how you win, and they werent as dominant as well.
But again, since we all know Wiscy is all about the run game, and its had 2 bad years to their standards, in a row, as I said, Barry is getting older, he has his standards,that we can all agree upon.
Theyve been slipping some.
It makes sense, so has Barry
My biggest problem with Alvarez was his tremendous influence on Big 10 Schedules over the years. Wisconsin's schedules have been a gravy train compared to other schools in the B10 West. Didn't like what he did to Gary Anderson either.
I respect what he built at Wisky, but he became irritating the last 10-15 years. Very controlling imo
Wiscys on the downward spiral
My biggest problem with Alvarez was his tremendous influence on Big 10 Schedules over the years. Wisconsin's schedules have been a gravy train compared to other schools in the B10 West. Didn't like what he did to Gary Anderson either.
I respect what he built at Wisky, but he became irritating the last 10-15 years. Very controlling imo
I'm just pointing this out because in 2019, Taylor was held to under 100 yds in that rose bowl, they threw 35 times in that rose bowl,and in 2018 and 2019, they had O linemen drafted for the first time since 2014 and even with Taylor, didnt have the performance overall that one might expect.To note, Wisconsin didn't go with their freshman stud RB until mid-November. Berger did have nearly 300 yards of offense at about 6 yards per rush in the final three regular season games he played in.
But yes, the Badgers were searching for an identity last season with the frequent Covid interruptions. Anyone's guess if they will be effective or not in 2021.
Wisconsin did not have two bad years by their standards in a row. They won 10 games, played in the Rose Bowl, and finished ranked 11th in the AP in the 2019. That's not a bad season even by their standards. If you suggest they ran less than 2018, sure -- that's true. They were still a top 20 rushing team nationally and #2 in the Big Ten. Ultimately, they won the West Division in 2019.
Yes, 2020 was rotten by their standards (one, not two in a row). Again, I don't know nor does anyone if that's a trend or a Covid anomaly. I will also say the same with Michigan and Penn State -- I suspect none of those teams really fell as far for a long-term trend as we saw in 2020 -- there's not yet enough evidence to support a trend. Now, if those teams fail again in 2021, you might have something. I simply need to see more evidence before I predict a downward spiral. Maybe it happens, maybe it doesn't.
Iowa drubbed wiscy last year. Their qb, wiscys, came out on fire,but once seen, he wasnt a killer, though likely will be very good.I've been saying that about Wisconsin and Iowa for what seems a decade now.
Somehow they figure out how to keep winning and occasionally winning a lot.
I'll mark it down as wishful thinking on my part until the wheels really do come off or we're beating them consistently.
That's where Nebraska football is right now. I'll feel better about us when we can beat two teams I didn't see as our equal when we were coming into the conference.
Iowa drubbed wiscy last year. Their qb, wiscys, came out on fire,but once seen, he wasnt a killer, though likely will be very good.
Both are beatable,our best chance is this year,likely in awhile.
Not convinced iowa will be any better this year, but we should be.
Yea, agreed, we dont know what we'll have.I've been saying some variant of this since Melvin Gordon and Brandon Scherff left. This is the year.
I stopped believing myself because it never seemed to be the year.
I'm in 100% 'Missouri' mode right now as it relates to beating either of those schools.
Love to see it, but until it actually happens, I'm going to remain skeptical.
Yea, agreed, we dont know what we'll have.
But wiscy has taken a step back here,and Barry being gone,he oversaw that team.
They had a coach quit because of that,and whats funny is, that coach didnt skip a beat either.
BA has been grooming his replacement,lets see how well thats received.
I think what happens there will have impact on wiscy going forwards.
BA had his/our system down pat, with him gone, and is his replacement doesnt get placed, it'll really be a whole new ball game.
And even though grooming a AD isnt the same as grooming and picking a new coach, add in system, and BA had it all going on.
Certainly.I think we (or at least some of us) agree NU is headed in the right direction. Wisconsin under Alvarez was there. He had it dialed in.
I have no doubt they could take significant steps backward in the coming years, but they're in decent shape from a talent standpoint and should be able to sustain success in the near term.