Not the contract with us but his new contract with with OSU is self evident. If the next lowst contract in P5 is well over a million and he accepts less than 1/3 of that it could be argued to be a punitive move on his part to punish his previous employer. giving an unfair advantage to his current employer who is also a competitor in the abstract of his current employer.Not necessarily true. But assuming arguendo that you are correct, do you have evidence that Mike Riley entered into the contract in bad faith?
Supposedly Doc Sadler tried it at KU after he was fired here. He asked Bill Self for a $1 annual salary.Not the contract with us but his new contract with with OSU is self evident. If the next lowst contract in P5 is well over a million and he accepts less than 1/3 of that it could be argued to be a punitive move on his part to punish his previous employer. giving an unfair advantage to his current employer who is also a competitor in the abstract of his current employer.
Not the contract with us but his new contract with with OSU is self evident. If the next lowst contract in P5 is well over a million and he accepts less than 1/3 of that it could be argued to be a punitive move on his part to punish his previous employer. giving an unfair advantage to his current employer who is also a competitor in the abstract of his current employer.
Not the contract with us but his new contract with with OSU is self evident. If the next lowst contract in P5 is well over a million and he accepts less than 1/3 of that it could be argued to be a punitive move on his part to punish his previous employer. giving an unfair advantage to his current employer who is also a competitor in the abstract of his current employer.
I tried not to read those posts. The first time I did, I got dummer.
I agree move on and forward.
Ummm in the other threa....nevermind.Agreed. Besides, we only have two facts (contract and new job/salary). Who's to say that MR and UNL haven't already worked out an agreement.
The picture in your avatar is pretty telling that you actually did.
Shhhhhh. Dude stop making so much sense..If people can not see what MR did here, then God help them. No need to argue with them. They simply can not be helped.Not the contract with us but his new contract with with OSU is self evident. If the next lowst contract in P5 is well over a million and he accepts less than 1/3 of that it could be argued to be a punitive move on his part to punish his previous employer. giving an unfair advantage to his current employer who is also a competitor in the abstract of his current employer.
Not necessarily true. But assuming arguendo that you are correct, do you have evidence that Mike Riley entered into the contract in bad faith?
His contract required him to attempt to find appropriate employment,within a reasonable amount of time,at and this is the key Fair Market wages for position taken.I tried not to read those posts. The first time I did, I got dummer.
This ^^^I do not believe that's a path that Nebraska really wants to go. Riley is a good guy even though his coaching didn't live up to what the program had hoped.
It would be a terrible PR move on many fronts, and would be brought up if we were in a future situation where we were trying to bring in new coaches across the board, not just football.
Maybe MR did and maybe he didn't. I say pick your battles. This isn't one worth tilting at.Shhhhhh. Dude stop making so much sense..If people can not see what MR did here, then God help them. No need to argue with them. They simply can not be helped.