Let's see, a poster makes a snarky response to an accurate post I made (Bookie did state that he was a commit through April), apparently irritated that I'd dare to doubt that Bookie or any of the other early commits to the Riley class would even consider decommitting had Mike Riley been retained. Weird. Had Mike never lost a commit in the past? Well, of course he had. I respond back and I'm somehow off to a "bad start"??? Maybe you offend easily?
Regardless, thanks for your concern. I think I'll somehow be okay... It's okay for anyone here to have the opinion that Mike Riley was some sort of recruiting marvel. Scoreboard, depth chart, and actual results say otherwise. It's okay for people to think that he'd eventually produce championship results on the field. It's also okay for others to have the opposite opinion. I think that's what message boards are for.