But your guessingMaybe Wisconsin made adjustments to take away Mills?
But your guessingMaybe Wisconsin made adjustments to take away Mills?
But your guessing
Haven't read the whole thread so not sure if this has been stated yet, but I noticed he had the most success with the stretch plays they ran to the outside. O-line blocked well and receivers were able to maintain their blocks more consistently as well. But IMO the stretch plays we were running really suited Mills, more so than the inside runs.
I have no proof, just what I remember seeing, but I believe he was limping on a few series. Could have been just a minor ankle sprain, who knows. I think if he would have been able to go, we would have seen him in there.Think we probably could have used him in the 2nd half?
Seemed to be doing pretty well in the 1st.
that's a good point. I wonder if the stretch plays give Mills more time to read and adjust to the hole and don't require him to be as patient as the IZ would?
Also the receivers were really solid with their blocking this game
whats your best guess?We are all speculating as to why
whats your best guess?
I'm curious how it makes a difference to you on outside zone when a team runs 3-4 or 4-3.Outside zone is a good play against a 3-4. Not as good against 4-3. In many cases inside zone read is better against 4-3, but when executed well like the video posted it will work against anything.
I'm curious how it makes a difference to you on outside zone when a team runs 3-4 or 4-3.
Just my opinion, but I think it is easier to set the edge against a 3-4 on outside zone read.