D
Deleted member 3889
Guest
See the second paragraph of post 68. No need to repeat it.
So it means his opinion on the program toughening up is somehow lessened?
See the second paragraph of post 68. No need to repeat it.
Bad memory on the plan to redshirt Green, who carried the ball quite a bit for a true freshman in a humiliation of Okie Light in the very first game. If there was a plan to redshirt him that you heard about, it must've been when Ahman was a sophomore in HS. That kid was so far ahead of Benning and Childs and Sims, it wasn't funny. Sure some of them looked pretty good in mop up duty, but in real games...not so much. You might recall the famous K-State game with Berringer getting almost no snaps and Turman carrying the load? The game plan was basically for Turman to hand the ball to LP, Mackovicka or Schlesinger. LP was exhausted, but did they give him a breather for Childs or Benning? Yeah, Childs got 2 carries for 0 yards and Benning got 1 carry for negative yardage. Hypothetically, if TO could've gotten the Central HS coach to loan him AG for the game, he'd have done well.At the start of 95 the plan actually was to RS Green, but he was just too good to keep off the field, and then when LP had his problems it was a moot point.
We hear it in some form every year, but this seems different. As Sam says in his article Riley now has a lot more of his recruits on board and he is changing the routine from what it was with with players who were already here when he became HC.That pretty much covers it right there
We hear it in some form every year, but this seems different. As Sam says in his article Riley now has a lot more of his recruits on board and he is changing the routine from what it was with with players who were already here when he became HC.
http://www.omaha.com/huskers/footba...cle_480dcb2b-4f3f-5644-bcb5-85780c88eaa1.html
I think this quote from Sam's article is important. "Guys will buy in or cash out and transfer, clearing space for better fits. Diaco is going to be his relentless self every day. I like that about him, and it’ll be helpful for an NU program where student-athletes — even the backups — are treated exceedingly well. With Diaco, you can’t take off plays or practices, or skate on off-the-field stuff. Nebraska’s defense, a spirited-but-meltdown-prone unit since joining the Big Ten, needs that kind of discipline."
I heard many times on Sharp and Benning during the Bo years how soft practices were, how lax they were. Jason Peter was especially vocal about it. Apparently, Diaco is of a different mind set when it comes to physical and mental preparation.
I think this sentence demonstrates how profound of a culture problem Coach Riley inherited.
Navigating that takes incredibly organizational leadership skills.
Plenty of others said the same thing.I agree that it is good to hear things are more rigorous. However, I don't fully believe anything DiNardo says about NU or any other school. He is somewhat of a sensationalist IMO and it serves him well in his role. If I wanted a truly objective opinion I would look elsewhere.
He was better than average.OK so this may be considered blasphemy but here is my opinion on this. DB will never admit that any team was as good as the teams he was on or as tough as the teams he was on. My issue is when he talks he speaks as if he was a huge part of those teams. In reality he was a bit player on those teams. Does anyone believe that if he was the starter through his years the we go undefeated? I do not. He was at best an average college RB. In 95 I believe he was 4th string most of the year. (LP, AG, CC, and maybe even Simms were ahead) Yet to hear him talk he was the straw that stirred the drink. So he has no objectivity because if everything is not as TO did it. it is not as good.
Damon was better than an average RB. He was on a team with exceptional talent and depth. And they were exceptionally tough. You really think in 95 we WOULDN'T have gone undeafeated with DB? With THAT line, TOMMIE at QB, Mackovicka etc.? It's not only the mid 90s teams that practiced like that, it was all of Osborne's teams. Sorry, you can't convince me running 1 station with every else standing around with their thumbs up their 4th point of contact (paratrooper term) is even remotely close to the difficulty of everyone participating in a practice with 4 stations going on concurrently.OK so this may be considered blasphemy but here is my opinion on this. DB will never admit that any team was as good as the teams he was on or as tough as the teams he was on. My issue is when he talks he speaks as if he was a huge part of those teams. In reality he was a bit player on those teams. Does anyone believe that if he was the starter through his years the we go undefeated? I do not. He was at best an average college RB. In 95 I believe he was 4th string most of the year. (LP, AG, CC, and maybe even Simms were ahead) Yet to hear him talk he was the straw that stirred the drink. So he has no objectivity because if everything is not as TO did it. it is not as good.
Let me do a little math for you since you seem challenged. There were well over 100 college teams at that time with over 100 scholarship players. On average they probably had 8 scholarship RBs. That means 800 RBs in College FB or 200 per class. If every NFL team retains an RB that's under 30 RB's who make it. An average RB rated between say #80 and #120 would not be retained in the NFL. He'd have to be somewhere in the top 30 or thereabouts. Pretty simple. You are welcome for the quick lesson in el ed level math and common sense.good post.
I looked and also could not find a single stat.
OK so this may be considered blasphemy but here is my opinion on this. DB will never admit that any team was as good as the teams he was on or as tough as the teams he was on. My issue is when he talks he speaks as if he was a huge part of those teams. In reality he was a bit player on those teams. Does anyone believe that if he was the starter through his years the we go undefeated? I do not. He was at best an average college RB. In 95 I believe he was 4th string most of the year. (LP, AG, CC, and maybe even Simms were ahead) Yet to hear him talk he was the straw that stirred the drink. So he has no objectivity because if everything is not as TO did it. it is not as good.
So, in other words, you think all 3 of these guys (Benning, Childs & Sims) were better than Ahman Green? I hope you are aware that Ahman was not all-big 8 in 1995, that was Troy Davis from ISU and David Thompson of OSU.so to pile on....imo if DB is the starter on that '95 team he's all big 8. part of that is due to the dominant OL, but i don't think he was a slouch at all. Childs and Sims would have probably been all big 8 as well if they were the 'man'. that group of RBs was as good as it gets.