Who's your starters?Splitting hairs on a word with sliding parameters and over thinking it. Can't wait for the season to get started.
Who's your starters?Splitting hairs on a word with sliding parameters and over thinking it. Can't wait for the season to get started.
Yes, and you pay to be subjected to such harrowing treatment.Splitting hairs on a word with sliding parameters and over thinking it. Can't wait for the season to get started.
Who's your starters?
Yes, and you pay to be subjected to such harrowing treatment.
They seem set for two deeps, where being 2nd only matters in a few non rotational/low rotational positions.I'm close to having something on that.
But are you "close"?I'm close to having something on that.
But are you "close"?
Closer than the space between the legs of a fly rubbing them together close?But are you "close"?
lol so you think that's off the beaten path? Anyway have it your way the bottom line is to many fumbles recovered or not is an offense killer imo. I believe an interception that wasn't caught is called an incomplete pass! lolWell I guess it shows you can find a statistic for anything if you get off the beaten path. Here is the official NCAA stats where they list it as fumbles lost.
They don’t have a stat for interceptions that weren’t caught.
NCAA College Football FBS current team Stats | NCAA.com
Discover the current NCAA FBS Football leaders in every stats category, as well as historic leaders.www.ncaa.com
We don’t get to have it both ways. We can’t in good faith argue that the Nebraska program was “close” to being a winner at the end of 2021 when they have made wholesale changes throughout the offseason.
While you might choose to look at that as a glass half empty opinion on the 2021 season, I see it as a very positive take on Nebraska’s prospects for 2022: Frost saw the deficiencies within his program – in schematics, development, talent, depth, game day roles, and more.
I also do not agree with the thesis … close losses do not necessarily mean anything but that we lost a bunch of games by 8 points or less.
I can agree that NU was probably the best 3-9 team in the nation.
I can also agree that improvement in say special teams could’ve meant 2 or 3 more wins.
But … there are not many (if any) here on this board that didn’t see anything but a flawed team, particularly with coaching (ex: o-line), scheme (ex: 2AM right, 2AM left, 2AM up the middle).
If NU could’ve had some of those close losses converted into wins say 6-6 or 7-5 last year they still would’ve been a flawed team. There are some of us, including me that think an 8, 9 or gasp even a 10 win season is possible if all these changes coalesce in a positive manner.
Point being the assumption that we were “close” last season is not the same as a bunch of close losses. The author is right … 8 close losses don’t necessarily make us “close” … but there aren’t many (in my opinion) who think that we will be good this year because we were “close” last year.
In 10 Years I hope to have forgotten all about last season. A continuous loop of gut wrenching, logic defying losses.10 years from now no one will say that was one of the best 3 win teams in history. It will simply be they were a 3 win team.
Yep, cuz they were closeIn 10 Years I hope to have forgotten all about last season. A continuous loop of gut wrenching, logic defying losses.