That was two regimes ago
Correct, why Frost isn't going to right the ship overnight. The program needs a lot of work to get better. It certainly isn't going to happen in 2 seasons, probably won't happen in 3 or 4.
That was two regimes ago
Not really relevant to this OP but I'm so tired of hearing this, especially when many on this board were pumping gallons of sunshine about how well the previous regime was recruiting. Good coaches can beat you with his then turn around and beat you with yours (not an original statement)
Not really relevant to this OP but I'm so tired of hearing this, especially when many on this board were pumping gallons of sunshine about how well the previous regime was recruiting. Good coaches can beat you with his then turn around and beat you with yours (not an original statement)
I think West 'O'who's hood is that? ;0)
Maybe this may all be correct but I have some trouble believing this level of athletes are so specialized that they either poorly suited for a different scheme, that really isn't that different from any other, or that they are completely worthless. There is an argument to be made but I think the athletes at that time were relatively just as "elite" as the athletes now.That quote came from the era of single platoon football, probably does not apply as well to the era of coaches committed to brining in "their system" that is needed to be successful.
Here with Scott, that is not only his offensive scheme but the commitment to go back to being DONU which I think we all support as being key to our long term success:
1. Walk on program
2. Strength and conditioning
3. Best facilities or at least top 5%
4. Re-establish connection to our heritage/former players
5. Lock down recruiting within 500 miles plus strengthen recruiting of 4/5 star skill players
This is/was what made The Bob Father and Dr Tom successful and anyone who thought Scott was going to get accomplished in two seasons is not in close touch with the program and its competitors.
GBR
Correct, why Frost isn't going to right the ship overnight. The program needs a lot of work to get better. It certainly isn't going to happen in 2 seasons, probably won't happen in 3 or 4.
If NU is not better at year 4 then that will be a failure by SF and not the fault of any previous regimes.
C
Maybe this may all be correct but I have some trouble believing this level of athletes are so specialized that they either poorly suited for a different scheme, that really isn't that different from any other, or that they are completely worthless.
If NU is not better at year 4 then that will be a failure by SF and not the fault of any previous regimes.
C
The question is a little moot in my opinion because the same guys aren't starting this year that started last year. The OL is not as good this year for the simple fact that we don't have the same starters as we did last year, now do we? Also, we lost StanleyMorgan and Ozigbo, both of whom were the two best players on our offense last year. This isn't an "apples to apples" comparison, is it? Each year in college football is a different story with kids graduating. This is a very young team with young depth too.
What does it mean if we’re not even competitive? “If we can't win this game, we are in trouble.”
What does it mean if we’re not even competitive?