My all time favorite was Danny Manning.
-
You do not need to register if you are not going to pay the yearly fee to post. If you register please click here or log in go to "settings" then "my account" then "User Upgrades" and you can renew.
HuskerMax readers can save 50% on Omaha Steaks .
Latrell Neville 4* WR: Nebraska Is His Leader/Update: Will Announce 4 July
- Thread starter Red Reign
- Start date
I keep thinking somewhere in the deep, dark recesses of the coach's minds is a jumbo package that includes all of that size and speed on the field. Toss in Hickman, and you put some defenders in a really tough spot.
give me a goal line set with some of those 6'-9" offensive tackles lined up at wideout....
Talk about a jumbo set
Yup
Not to mention Manning will be a senior when he arrives to boot thus, the playing time will be there for him to take
In fairness, this entire recruiting forum contains examples of people committing decommitting and doing it over again. For every example of those who decommit from somewhere else to become N, there's probably the same number of folks who have decommitted from N and gone somewhere else.
Just look at Wiltfong's last minute switches over the course of history. Holding up an example of 2 players as the 'rule' does not really make it the rule considering actual history when going beyond those 2 players.
There's really nutt'n wrong having an opinion that decommitting form one place may increase the odds of decomitting again...peeps could cite to more than just college football to demonstrate the accuracy of the thesis.
But, bottom line, hopefully Neville commits on the 4th and signs the LOI when he can.
An opinion is great but the history as a whole does not support multiple Decommits except in rare cases.
It just does not
No one really said anything a said anything about multiple decommits, other than really using this to demonstrate that the likelihood of decommitting again goes up once a person reneges on their original commitment. Just that the possibility increases, that is history and human sociology.
It's really not a hard thesis to understand as we both know.
Your right it's not hard to understand and the history just does not support the premise
Actually...history and social science supports the premise that if a person commits to something, then decommits, the chances of a subsequent decommit increase. That doesn't mean that it becomes more than a 50% chance that it will happen again, just that it is more likely to happen than if there never had been an original commitment.
This is not difficult as we both know.
Here's to hoping that if Neville commits, he remains committed.
Pete "Popcorn" Manning.
What is the third emoji
Final 4 are Nebraska, Florida, West Virginia and Penn State
So it is a mountain. Looks like a funny colored turd emoji
Fitting. That's the way I describe west virginia to people who've never been there
