initial thought - intriguing, best 14 team scheduling I've seen.
further review - worry about designated 5 being "even" for everyone - (example) Wisky's 5 seem less challenging than most of the upper teams. understand that's a variable which can be tweaked, just wonder if it will ever seem equal.
also wonder about fan confusion.
I think fan confusion would be an initial problem, and maybe the set schedules are a little off as of yet. But, I think when you look at the schedules as a whole, the year in year out schedules will be pretty even. Plus, strength of schedule inequities are a problem in the current system too. They were even worse in the Big XII.