Maybe, if he posts on here by the SN of Paramus..... I'm not going to mention any names, however....
Well I was going to ask if you meant our friend above.
The article though is from 9-9-2016.
Maybe, if he posts on here by the SN of Paramus..... I'm not going to mention any names, however....
Is this letter real or a farce?
https://michigan.rivals.com/news/staff-picks-u-m-vs-ucf-and-the-frost-letter-origin
By this line from the link it sounds to me like it's BS. I really can't imagine this is from Carol Frost.
I am surprised that you responded to my post since nothing in your reply refuted anything I said. Sure, Nebraska vs Michigan is a big game...duh. Does SF add to the "bigness," sure a little. But still, there aren't any fans stupid enough to think this year's game will prove who was better in 1997.
"'including the truth behind “the letter” – allegedly written by UCF head coach Scott Frost’s mom, Carol'"You ask me if the letter is real or a farce? How in the world would I know? You know as much about it as I do.
According to the article, Rivals .com was the original recipient of Carol Frost's letter, and due to the email address it came from, they felt it was authentic, so they posted it on their subscribers web site.
I would think she doesn't care one way or another.If she does not care to deny it or comment on it, then I would assume it is authentic.
"'including the truth behind “the letter” – allegedly written by UCF head coach Scott Frost’s mom, Carol'"
Allegedly tells me all I really need to know. I think it was some clown trying to raise some crap.
I think she is above doing something like this. I feel she knows Scott is a big boy and can handle it himself.But when Michgian fans are always saying unflattering things about your son and the magnificent 1997 football team that he led...
Good point, is anyone really so egomaniacal as to sign their letters "1968 Olympian, Mexico City," LOL.I can’t imagine a mother writing that letter. I’m calling BS on that unless she actually confirmed it. Michigan can post Scott’s comments all they want. He was 100% accurate in what he said about the Huskers and Michigan that year. Without question, Nebraska would have been favored by 7 or more; and given the choice of choosing a team you think was more beatable, that would be Michigan. So Michigan would win that debate
The self-proclaimed realists are just agnostics. Nothing any more realistic about their view than ours. They just don't know how the season will go so they are cautious. Nothing wrong with that, but it's no more realistic than my viewpoint.Looks like the SF era has optimists and realists. No pessimists so far that I know of. I'd say that's an improvement from where we were.
solesfr said 10-2 no excuses as a jab at people who were critical of Riley. It was pretty transparent.You don't need a decoder ring as you know exactly what is being said. You are just trying to distract from your statements of anything less than 10-2 is inexcusable knowing you were making excuses for Mike Riley's 5-7, 9-3, and 4-8 the whole time.
Don't be surprised. I am not afraid to admit when I am wrong.
I responded to your post to SUPPORT what you said. I agreed with you in my post when I said "Fans may not view this year's NU/MU game as the one to settle what happened in 1997, but any appearance by Scott Frost in Ann Arbor will create much more ire than a normal game.
Leading up to the 2016 UCF vs MU game in Ann Arbor, I knew there were some articles written about Michigan's desire to get back at SF. I thought I read where UM fans wanted to use the UCF/MU game to settle the 1997 debate, but I was mistaken. There was nothing there.
So I responded back to you with the news that you are right. Do you mind?
While conducting my research, I did verify that Michigan fans have pretty strong feelings about SF, and they would like to beat him more than the average head football coach.
My research also uncovered the letter from Carol Frost, which I had never seen before. Rivals.com thinks it is authentic, I don't know if it is or not.
NOTE: I also admit that you did not call Bo Pelini a knuckle dragger. It was Suhperman who did that. You called him a mouth breather, correct?
"What do I think of the Greatest Fan of All? That's a good question and I'm glad you asked. He's a knuckle dragger."
Just because you put it in quotes and tried to attach to Bo, it is still a personal attack.
C
Its just a joke. I don't think GFOA is a knuckle dragger. I like him. He's the GFOA and the GTOA. I always enjoy reading his stuff.
I think she is above doing something like this. I feel she knows Scott is a big boy and can handle it himself.
And BO used the excuse..."They" didn't execute.Its called reasons. Excuses are when you blamed Bo for everything Mike Riley did wrong.