http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4vtOrd1U5Z8&feature=related
...he's probably not going to get the benefit of the doubt.
Certainly not from some...
But you will won't you Bils???
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4vtOrd1U5Z8&feature=related
...he's probably not going to get the benefit of the doubt.
I wondered what was wrong with you all this time! LOL!! Concussions happen in football. I like they try to protect players from it, but it is a danger of playing the game. It is like fatalities in the armed services. Sometimes just can't be avoided.I played linebacker in High School. I can say that I had my bell rung a few times from interior hits -which probably explains some of my incoherent posts - I think it does cause as much damage...take Mike Webster for example...
I've sometimes wondered if a softer (but thick) helmet would make a difference. Something that would still protect your head, but couldn't be used as easily as a weapon when hitting.
It's not a dirty play. It's a football play. He was correctly penalized, but it doesn't mean he had "dirty" intentions
that play on Delhomme was a dirty play...what are you watching?? Whether his intent was "dirty" is irrelevent...the act itself was "dirty" and shows a lack of control/maturity. I hope he has learned from this year and realizes you don't have to be a douche on the field to intimidate other players...I can garuantee you that other NFL OL are not getting "intimdiated" by Suh and some of his extracuricular antics.
Certainly not from some...
But you will won't you Bils???
Total Wussification of football almost complete. Congrats.
That particular play has nothing to do with "wussification". You don't go throwing people around with their head. Period.
When he's got criticism coming I'll criticize...I won't come up with silly weight transfer arguments.
That's why he was penalized.
The "wussification" comments were directed at unmartin's post. If you think hard, fast, violent football is "dirty" you're contributing to the wussification of football.
Probably a good decision. If you don't understand the physics behind it, any argument you offered would very likely be silly.
Don't need to understand the physics...it was irrelevant.
You mistakenly believe that because you don't understand it.
Listen, Einstein...I get what you were saying in your silly defense of suh. And agree...if his intent were to truly injure the guy he would have really "stomped" him. It's not much different than what Christian Laettner did (although Suh's was a little worse): http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6AwYVTB2rZw No real intent to hurt the guy but classless nonetheless.