ThisTo do that would require a pretty big jump in defense, imo, and I don't know that we can count on that.
ThisTo do that would require a pretty big jump in defense, imo, and I don't know that we can count on that.
I kind of think that's a universal impulse among football fans, or even among everyone about everything, really. I do it all the time.Seems to me there's little basis for predicting we're favored in 11 games except that persistent sense of entitlement (call it optimism, if you prefer) that pervades most Husker fans when predicting wins and losses.
I kind of think that's a universal impulse among football fans, or even among everyone about everything, really. I do it all the time.
You look at your weaknesses and make a plan to get better (this new recruit will be great, this coach will finally figure out a scheme, the weight training will really take off, etc.), then you assume (1) all the good stuff you hope for will happen and none of the bad stuff will happen, and (2) you underestimate how much every other team is also getting better and developing in their own ways.
It's just optimism. I think we all have it because it's a valuable trait from an evolutionary perspective. Cave men had to be optimistic that when they left the cave they would kill a rabbit and not be killed by a tiger. Otherwise they would have huddled in their cave and starved.
And if they wouldn't go out and get a rabbit, they could forget about procreating with Mrs. Cave Woman. That just ain't happenin'. So only the optimistic passed on their genes.
So you have 5 wins and 7 question marks. Pretty short limb you are going on to. You are probably right that those are questionable games. If we go 4-3 on the questionable games, its 8-4. Still quite a jump.[1] S. Alabama [WIN] - New HC in 2018; went with a LOT of young guys and 2019 won't be much better.
[2] AT Colorado [?] - New HC is defense first guy. Not sure what to expect; after the #1 guys, the depth chart has issues.
[3] N. Illinois [WIN] - NIU looked like a flaming ball of crap in their bowl game but return a lot of depth in '19.
[4] AT Illinois [WIN] - Problems from admin to coaches to roster.
[5] Ohio St [?] - Hopefully Nebraska has some momentum coming into this game.
[6] Northwestern [?] - Fitzgerald knows how to deal with adversity and win. 5-star Clemson transfer H. Johnson steps in for Thorson at QB but they lose 4 other starters on O and 5 more on D.
[7] AT Minnesota [?] - Young roster with confidence after beating Wisconsin; let's see how they do in their bowl game. Offense (2-deep) has 17 of 22 FR and SO.
[8] BYE #1 - Definitely need the break.
[9] Indiana [W] - Scrappy team trying to figure things out but too many issues.
[10] AT Purdue [?] - J. Brohm is back; QB Blough is gone but Sindelar is just as good (if his knee holds up) and R. Moore is lightning.
[11] BYE #2 - Good break for the final 3-game stretch.
[12] Wisconsin [?] - Chryst's QB picture is murky. The D loses some guys as does the OL.
[13] AT Maryland [?] - M. Locksley, new HC from Alabama (OC) is a crapshoot. HC experience is N. Mexico (2-26) and Maryland (1-5).
[14] Iowa [W] - If Nebraska is healthy and 2-0 after the break, they will right the ship.
Wisconsin tooNice to see Iowa with some actual tough crossover games for once.
I'm glad you didn't do something unrealistic in year 2 like predict 12-0.
I like Kool-Aid as much as the next Husker but I also try to be more realistic in my assessment. It's easy to look at the schedule and starting counting Ws but Nebraska has some holes to fill on both sides of the ball and the reasons listed below are why I'm not drinking any Kool-Aid yet; winter conditioning and spring ball will provide some clarity.So you have 5 wins and 7 question marks. Pretty short limb you are going on to. You are probably right that those are questionable games. If we go 4-3 on the questionable games, its 8-4. Still quite a jump.
He is likely correct about the first 4 games nu being favored. Likely correct about being dogs to usu. Likely to be favored v. nw, min and indiana. Purdue is questionable. Probably favored v. Wisco and iowa and maryland. So he really isn't stepping too far out on the limb.Seems to me there's little basis for predicting we're favored in 11 games except that persistent sense of entitlement (call it optimism, if you prefer) that pervades most Husker fans when predicting wins and losses.
To do that would require a pretty big jump in defense, imo, and I don't know that we can count on that.
I kind of think that's a universal impulse among football fans, or even among everyone about everything, really. I do it all the time.
You look at your weaknesses and make a plan to get better (this new recruit will be great, this coach will finally figure out a scheme, the weight training will really take off, etc.), then you assume (1) all the good stuff you hope for will happen and none of the bad stuff will happen, and (2) you underestimate how much every other team is also getting better and developing in their own ways.
It's just optimism. I think we all have it because it's a valuable trait from an evolutionary perspective. Cave men had to be optimistic that when they left the cave they would kill a rabbit and not be killed by a tiger. Otherwise they would have huddled in their cave and starved.
And if they wouldn't go out and get a rabbit, they could forget about procreating with Mrs. Cave Woman. That just ain't happenin'. So only the optimistic passed on their genes.
I kind of think that's a universal impulse among football fans, or even among everyone about everything, really. I do it all the time.
You look at your weaknesses and make a plan to get better (this new recruit will be great, this coach will finally figure out a scheme, the weight training will really take off, etc.), then you assume (1) all the good stuff you hope for will happen and none of the bad stuff will happen, and (2) you underestimate how much every other team is also getting better and developing in their own ways.
It's just optimism. I think we all have it because it's a valuable trait from an evolutionary perspective. Cave men had to be optimistic that when they left the cave they would kill a rabbit and not be killed by a tiger. Otherwise they would have huddled in their cave and starved.
And if they wouldn't go out and get a rabbit, they could forget about procreating with Mrs. Cave Woman. That just ain't happenin'. So only the optimistic passed on their genes.