Yea it is funny. Imagine fans dissing on a guy who had to rebuild a program going 11-3 with all 3 losses to top 10 teams. The silliness of our fans.
We’re?
Depends upon the definition of reasonable and how tired of losing we are. If you were the AD and I told you you could pay someone like Urban Meyer 20 million for three years, you could be in the National competition again, ($60 million) and then hand the keys off to Mickey, or pay Matt Rhule (a question mark in terms of if he can turn this program around) $72 million over 8 years, is that unreasonable? It’s not to me, but then again, I’m tired of being an irrelevant football program. Let’s have this conversation again in four years, I doubt you’ll disagree.
I agree how silly for us to believe that he’s a program builder when he leaves after a couple seasons Every stop. Heck he’s on his 4th job in ten years. But if he quit today the record book would show him to be an average coach that did not stay to long anywhere. Just a thought,
But he hasn’t quit.
And I doubt you will still have the same argument.
Original. Realllll original.
This is fairly explained and rational. It’s unfortunate that the biggest critics citing these types of red flags don’t look at the supporting information. Basically “why”. Would it sound better if the argument was he never beat a top 10 team at Baylor? Would it sound better saying his last year he won against every team not ranked in the top 10? Would it sound better if you said that year he beat Every team he was supposed to and even two he wasn’t favored to win? Yes all that sounds better and is just as truthful but they won’t even try to rationalize those thoughts. They are locked into not beating a top 25 team.
read the thread title again
Ok, but why do wins at temple against top 20 teams not count? His Baylor team was probably better than his Temple teams.
