As others have said, there needs to be a balancing agent that presents the perspective of tradeoffs because we want the CDC to err on the side of caution. Without that balance, life can't be lived. Just as an illustration, the most dangerous thing that most of us do every day is to get into a car and drive on public roads, yet we do so because we view it as worth the tradeoff. We punish those who don't drive well, and we restrict some who aren't capable of driving well, but we don't shut down the roads because of some new wave of accidents. If you don't like that analogy, how about the bathroom in your house? The most dangerous room in the house is the bathroom, and the most dangerous place in the bathroom is the area next to the tub or shower as that is where more people slip and fall than anywhere else in the house: we don't tear out bathrooms because they're dangerous.
The thing about this lockdown that is so maddening is that we have a central authority (CDC) who is trying to make it as centrally controlled as possible, so we're not supposed to make individual determinations of risk. To take the analogy of the dangerous bathroom and expand it: they've basically told us that bathrooms are too dangerous to use, and they're considering using coercive means to keep us from using them ... for the good of all.
There are going to be Corona virus-related deaths that never show up in any of the CDC statistics for this pandemic. As I type this there are businesses going bankrupt, and people straining through unemployment, and those are two of the most serious causes of stress. Stress manifests itself in many forms, but there will be a lot of folks who not only lose their economic health, but also their physical health, and many will also end up going through divorce. Substance abuse and substance addiction are also more likely in people experiencing high levels of stress. All of these are common factors in depression and suicide.
It is a fiction that shutting down society won't cause other health issues.