How Far is Scott Frost from Taking Nebraska to the College Football Playoff?

[huskermike]

Methinks some need to gets the grips!

I have mine.

 

[huskermike]

How about we let him play 1 game before making grandiose predictions.

Now what kind of fun would that be? It's only a message board.

 

[jreb14]

Frost will have in contention every year bye year 3.

 

[HuskerTex]

Frost will have a team that will be competitive with Ohio State and Wisconsin by year 2. By year 4 we’ll be national contenders. Book it.

 

[AzHusker]

Frost will have a team that will be competitive with Ohio State and Wisconsin by year 2. By year 4 we’ll be national contenders. Book it.

I'll have a gallon jug of that. Yeah, just put it in a paper bag for me. Thanks.

 

[izzycohen]

The man hasn't had his first practice with this team yet. Why even go there?

 

[Red October]

That is a horrible article.

So says the egg man.

 

[Red October]

The man hasn't had his first practice with this team yet. Why even go there?

Where have you been izzy? Plenty of guys on this forum that re buidling unrealistic expectations for Frosts first year.

 

[Deleted member 5200]

So says the egg man.

I don't get it. What's "the egg man"?

 

[Zonie87]

Why not use season's results of wins and losses as a measurement versus points scored and allowed for Scott? That would skew your prognosis would it not?

 

[Queso]

Why not use season's results of wins and losses as a measurement versus points scored and allowed for Scott? That would skew your prognosis would it not?

1. I offered no prognoses, other than to say that Frost's defenses are a ways a way from where they need to be in order to be in the CFP discussion.

2. Wins and losses are a function of PF and PA. Also, Unless you have exactly 4 undefeated teams you have to use some kind of more granular evaluation.

 

[Deleted member 5200]

1. I offered no prognoses, other than to say that Frost's defenses are a ways a way from where they need to be in order to be in the CFP discussion.

Yeah, they were in the G5. That's pretty much completely out of the CFP discussion.

2. Wins and losses are a function of PF and PA. Also, Unless you have exactly 4 undefeated teams you have to use some kind of more granular evaluation.

Wins and losses are not a function of the season totals for PF and PA. Only in individual games.

I can have a team with high PF and low PA who has a losing season, and another team with high PA and low PF with a winning season.

 

[Discoverer27]

I don't get it. What's "the egg man"?

 

[Deleted member 5200]

Still don't get it.

 

[Discoverer27]

Still don't get it.

Neither do I. That is the only Eggman reference I know unless Humpty Dumpty qualifies..