Possible, not very likely though.... and also, this is a Scotty thread, not a Riley bashing thread, but thanks for playing.Same thing MR fans will say if NU has a losing record this year?
C
Possible, not very likely though.... and also, this is a Scotty thread, not a Riley bashing thread, but thanks for playing.Same thing MR fans will say if NU has a losing record this year?
C
Possible, not very likely though.... and also, this is a Scotty thread, not a Riley bashing thread, but thanks for playing.
LOL!!!!LOL, it will be in the same ball park at least. You know me...
C
Pretty funny.LOL, it will be in the same ball park at least. You know me...
C
If they have never won, yep. You'd be right on que.
The players love Frost and believe in what he is building. One senior I saw interviewed said it is a whole new culture and wish he had started in it.
Even the great ones can't rest on their laurels. That's what makes them great, year after year, competing for championships.Help me out here. Are you saying that coaches that have won don't have a lot to prove? ...or better yet, define "won" in this case.
Winning is winning, a lot. Championships. Always having a team competitive, even in a loss. Sometimes, you come up just short, but know you'll get them the next time.
Same thing MR fans will say if NU has a losing record this year?
I guess so man.That's right, HIO....so, in other words... a coach having a lot to prove describes most all coaches....
Strange how some can turn a thread about Scot Frost into a target of opportunity for some Riley bashing...
only in your head. Coaches can be judged on their own without being compared to a coach at a different level of play.On this thread it is MR apologists who are saying they are unimpressed with SF. So it seems logical to bring him up. And its not MR bashing. Its just stating facts.
Is this your new idea of a clever tag line?Or coaches can be compared to other coaches to put things in perspective. You can do it your way, and I'll do it my way....but whatever you do, don't knock the twist.
Is this your new idea of a clever tag line?
As to the topic I see nothing wrong with comparing P5 coaches to each other or comparing how a past coach vs a current coach do things. However comparing a coach with 20 years as a P5 coach to a 1 year G5 coach just seems like an apples to oranges comparison.