I do understand the negative comments... it's what Nebraska Basketball is all about... the program wins ~53% of the time.
Danny Nee (254-189) ~57%
Doc Sadler (99-78) ~56%
Not much history or tradition to build on, so my point was simply, at some point apathy has to yield to optimism.
For most that means a new coach, work that out however you want... but don't diminish the highlights along the journey.
As I've said over and over, there is absolutely no true comparison between Nee and Sadler. Yes, similar W-L percentage, but that's where it ends. Nee easily brought the program its greatest ever success -- and had post-season appearances and success that are second to none in Lincoln. Do I think Nee was "all that?" No. But as I will continue to say, if you can't be better than Danny Nee, you aren't a very good coach. Nee should be the benchmark -- and anything less than that is unacceptable.