Yep. Really. Try again?really???
Are you sure no one said something like that?
Last edited:
Yep. Really. Try again?really???
Are you sure no one said something like that?
really???
Are you sure no one said something like that?
True I did say that. I quoted you because I believe that post along with the other I quoted are making Minny out to be more than they are. Maybe you did not make them as much as my exaggerated statement. But IMO at worst it will be a close loss. Do not believe we get blown out. I think the winner wins by no more than 7-10 points.I'm not sure why you quoted me, but thank you!
Otherwise, I already took note of your claim that you exaggerate a lot, so no need to debate you.
No one said "best" or "toughest."
Oh and for the record I believe we win.I'm not sure why you quoted me, but thank you!
Otherwise, I already took note of your claim that you exaggerate a lot, so no need to debate you.
No one said "best" or "toughest."
OK try this one on for size.Yep. Really. Try again?
I hope you're right. I sort of think we might get rolled. We were an embarrassing loss for them last year and they have probably been thinking about this one all year. Everyone amps up their game when they play us. We have yet to do that for quite awhile. Fleck will not let up if they get ahead. He will pour it on.
nope. not even closeOK try this one on for size.
True I did say that. I quoted you because I believe that post along with the other I quoted are making Minny out to be more than they are. Maybe you did not make them as much as my exaggerated statement. But IMO at worst it will be a close loss. Do not believe we get blown out. I think the winner wins by no more than 7-10 points.
Oh and for the record I believe we win.
No. I'm just suggesting Minnesota may have a bit more impressive of a resume than Nebraska to this point. But keep in mind, Nebraska is bad -- so it's not like I'm saying Minnesota is good. I also don't believe I've said Minnesota will beat Nebraska, have I?
I would also say that AM looks better than Keller, too. In fact as mediocre as our offense is looking right now, it is better than the Keller offense considering the poorer level of talent we've currently got. I just remember the Offense looking pretty unimpressive with Keller at QB.Now back to the original subject. Yeah, I think Vedral as Ganz is a decent analogy. It is not apples to apples but not bad. The thing is, it is pretty well known that Ganz was looking as good or better than Sam Keller in practice pretty much all of fall camp. Callahan started Keller anyway. The other offensive guys preferred Ganz.
Vedral is a gamer just like Ganz though. I think he can win the game at Minnesota. I think his teammates will have confidence in his ability.
It's a small sample size, but Vedral looks to be the most capable back-up we've had since Ganz. I'd still rather have a healthy AM in the game, but I'm starting to wonder if he's been 100% at any time this year.
It's a little reminiscent of the last QB we had named Martinez who was electric as a redshirt freshman and then never the same due to an injury, the nature of which was never fully known.
He seems to struggle with reading comprehension when it comes to posts about the Gophers.Yep. Really. Try again?