Seems the offense was good with most things, except scoring.. so i have always thought that was a big reason why he is here now..
Red zone offense or red zone efficiency was a major reason for the coaching and personnel changes made in the off season. Frost said as much after the coaching changes. Pittsburgh finished 28th in red zone offense with Whipple’s offense. Nebraska finished 106th with Frost’s offense. Digging into that stat in a little more detail I discovered that Pittsburgh scored 25 red zone touchdowns by passing and Nebraska scored just 7 by passing. Nebraska did score 28 touchdowns rushing, which is good, but Pittsburgh, while scoring 25 passing also managed to score 24 touchdowns rushing. Pittsburgh’s red zone scoring percentage was .884 while Nebraska’s was .774. Turns out that Texas, where our new QB was playing last year was 4th in red zone scoring percentage.
Nebraska clearly had a red zone efficiency issue. In my opinion, this was caused by the following things:
1. Poor play calling.
2. Poor decision-making by the QB
3. Inconsistent run-blocking causing inability to pick up key 1st downs (touchdown scoring was pretty good).
4. Poor kicking
The good news is that attempts have been made to fix all of these things. Frost fired himself as play caller and replaced himself with someone more experienced. The QB was changed, through transfers. The QB coach was fired and replaced. The OC was fired and replaced. Frost hired an actual dedicated special teams coach. New kickers have been brought in. And to try to pick up those key 1st downs in the red zone, the OL coach was fired and replaced with someone who advocates a more aggressive approach. So at least the problem (lack of zone efficiency) was identified and attempts at solutions are in progress. Whether or not this problem is solved will have a large part in determining if Frost sticks around.