• You do not need to register if you are not going to pay the yearly fee to post. If you register please click here or log in go to "settings" then "my account" then "User Upgrades" and you can renew.

TJ Lateef

Dana has said it himself in interviews and press conferences. It’d be said by game announcers. The only thing Dana had done is slim done the playbook.
No, he hasn't said it in interviews and press conferences. He's said he's using Sat's language because it was easier for him to learn that language compared to the team learning his. That isn't "using Sat's playbook".

It's not even hard to see. I've asked many people to show me the same plays being run as last year. No one has even attempted it because they can't.

It's not hard to see different plays this year. Just look at the screens we're running this year. Lest we forget our attempts at screens last year, they were God awful. This year? We've housed many and had long gains on others. The Wheel routes are slightly different as well.
 
No, he hasn't said it in interviews and press conferences. He's said he's using Sat's language because it was easier for him to learn that language compared to the team learning his. That isn't "using Sat's playbook".

It's not even hard to see. I've asked many people to show me the same plays being run as last year. No one has even attempted it because they can't.

It's not hard to see different plays this year. Just look at the screens we're running this year. Lest we forget our attempts at screens last year, they were God awful. This year? We've housed many and had long gains on others. The Wheel routes are slightly different as well.

So.....they are phasing out Satt's playbook for a mystery coaches playbook ( different plays)?

I'm just attempting to understand how we are seeing different plays if they are the same as Satt's but not Dana's.

Then, I'm trying to tie in these "different" plays and where they may have come from if not from Dana.
7302435042136479023.gif
 
Last edited:
So.....they are phasing out Satt's playbook for a mystery coaches playbook ( different plays.

I'm just attempting to understand how we are seeing different plays if they are the same as Satt's but not Dana's.

Then, I'm trying to tie in these "different" plays and where they may have come from if not from Dana.View attachment 121214

I am wondering how you use the same language for plays that are different? It wouldn't work that way.
 
Last edited:
So.....they are phasing out Satt's playbook for a mystery coaches playbook ( different plays)?

I'm just attempting to understand how we are seeing different plays if they are the same as Satt's but not Dana's.

Then, I'm trying to tie in these "different" plays and where they may have come from if not from Dana.View attachment 121214
I really don’t understand this, sure maybe running that playbook for a few games last year but I can’t fathom not being completely replaced after the season.
 
I really don’t understand this, sure maybe running that playbook for a few games last year but I can’t fathom not being completely replaced after the season.

I certainly don't know what transpired in Lincoln, Nebraska.
I do know that Dana Holgorsen knows offense.
I know he has helped EJ and our offensive production, the output is data.
But, something is not right.
 
Nuance is difficult for those with agendas.
Agreed, which is why I keep asking for proof. If he's said numerous times it should be easy to find. Announcers are morons, they don't count as proof.
So.....they are phasing out Satt's playbook for a mystery coaches playbook ( different plays)?

I'm just attempting to understand how we are seeing different plays if they are the same as Satt's but not Dana's.

Then, I'm trying to tie in these "different" plays and where they may have come from if not from Dana.View attachment 121214
They aren't the same plays. Using the language doesn't mean the plays. This shouldn't be tough to understand.
 
Agreed, which is why I keep asking for proof. If he's said numerous times it should be easy to find. Announcers are morons, they don't count as proof.

They aren't the same plays. Using the language doesn't mean the plays. This shouldn't be tough to understand.
Agreed.
They are not the same plays.
So whose plays are they.
I want the origin story, not the language used.
 
Last edited:
Doesn’t matter whose plays they are—why can’t DR understand the language of a) get rid of ball b) don’t take a sack. If he can count to 3, he can do the first one.
 
Here is what AI said.

Dana Holgorsen has stated that while he has made changes to the Nebraska offense, the majority of the offensive scheme remains the same, built upon the foundation established by former offensive coordinator Marcus Satterfield.
He acknowledged the existing playbook and scheme were sound, noting that it makes sense for quarterback Dylan Raiola.
Holgorsen emphasized that his role was not to completely overhaul the offense but to refine and simplify it, focusing on what the players do well and eliminating unnecessary complexity.
He described the playbook as being "very large" due to contributions from multiple coaches with NFL backgrounds, including Rhule, Satterfield, Thomas, and Donovan Raiola, which contributed to its complexity.
His primary task was to streamline the playbook, ensuring that every play called made sense to him and, by extension, to the players.

Same playbook, just tweaked it. His words according to AI
 
Last edited:
Dana has said it himself in interviews and press conferences. It’s be said by game announcers. The only thing Dana had done is slim done the playbook.
So Dana said he is actually using a slimmed down version of Sat’s playbook this year??? Ummm, I’m going to need to see the video of this
 

GET TICKETS





Back
Top