I have heard rumors that Delaney is involved behind the scenes. I don’t know the validity but a few different guys are tweeting about it.Agree, we can only hope....but color me skeptical/pessimistic when it comes to Warren and the B1G Presidents.
I have heard rumors that Delaney is involved behind the scenes. I don’t know the validity but a few different guys are tweeting about it.Agree, we can only hope....but color me skeptical/pessimistic when it comes to Warren and the B1G Presidents.
Didn't the B1G hire someone to help Warren, i.e. hopefully do all the work to hand Warren a good idea on a silver platter so even he doesn't screw it up? Can't remember who but thought I heard that. It wasn't Delaney, though I am NOT saying Delaney is or isn't involved somehow.I have heard rumors that Delaney is involved behind the scenes. I don’t know the validity but a few different guys are tweeting about it.
I’ve heard that’s Alvarez’s role now. I can’t believe we hired a guy that is this incompetent. We shouldn’t have to hire people to hold our commissioners hand.Didn't the B1G hire someone to help Warren, i.e. hopefully do all the work to hand Warren a good idea on a silver platter so even he doesn't screw it up? Can't remember who but thought I heard that. It wasn't Delaney, though I am NOT saying Delaney is or isn't involved somehow.
Didn't the B1G hire someone to help Warren, i.e. hopefully do all the work to hand Warren a good idea on a silver platter so even he doesn't screw it up? Can't remember who but thought I heard that. It wasn't Delaney, though I am NOT saying Delaney is or isn't involved somehow.
This is a guy that a few posters recommended following. MABC says he’s connected to the Wisconsin athletic department. I have no clue but he puts out good information.
Exactly, I have no clue if it’s accurate but I like it.I am not sure if he knows his A from a hole in the ground, but I like what that guy is putting down right now.
This is a guy that a few posters recommended following. MABC says he’s connected to the Wisconsin athletic department. I have no clue but he puts out good information.
They go hand in hand.Bevo and the Land Thieves
I’m not sure football has to break away from the ncaa. After all there needs to be a rule setting entity and for the most part the ncaa is better suited than a new start up would be. (For those who want to say how bad the ncaa is regarding rules and following them I can assure you the new entity would meet with equal disgust).Travel is no longer a problem.
Football is about to break away from the NCAA. The women's rifle team, gymnastics, bowling and rowing can all still compete in the Big Ten, SEC, or whatever else exists.
I have a hunch that in 5 years, you'll see football as a standalone entity. We already have dozens (hundreds?) of schools who are affiliate members of conferences for certain sports. Notre Dame plays everything but football in the ACC. Johns Hopkins is an associate member of the Big Ten for lacrosse.
Every other sport is about to become "associate member of something" and football will be independent.
I'm betting on about 48 teams making the cut. Pure speculation on my part, but that would be the smart way to do it. I've said it a hundred times, but nobody cares about watching Akron play New Mexico State in the Snuggie Cactus Fart Bowl Sponsored by The General Auto Insurance Presented by Shaq.
That was exactly my point.I’m not sure football has to break away from the ncaa. After all there needs to be a rule setting entity and for the most part the ncaa is better suited than a new start up would be. (For those who want to say how bad the ncaa is regarding rules and following them I can assure you the new entity would meet with equal disgust).
What needs to happen is a new division within the ncaa that hosts those 48 or 64 teams. Now that is where the ncaa might screw up because if they don’t act those schools might.
Just 7 college football seasons ago, the B1G elected to water down the conference with the addition of Rutgers and Maryland
This was motivated entirely by geography
It had everything do with population and attendant number of television sets
Much has changed in the last 7 years
Geography {i.e. population and # of TV sets in a given area} is no longer much of a factor
Cable television is dying
The country is moving swiftly towards a streaming, subscription television model
What matters now is name recognition and brand value to stimulate interest, generate excitement., and secure said subscriptions
The SEC seems set to considerably elevate it’s own brand value with the addition of Oklahoma and Texas – two massive, brand name, college football programs
Blue bloods that most certainly stimulate interest and generate excitement
Need the B1G, in an effort to keep up with the SEC, act to expand once again?
Maybe yes…
Maybe no…
If the answer is yes, then I would think it imperative to target only those programs that bring a name brand value comparable to that which OU and UT will be delivering to the SEC
The remnants and scraps of the Big 12 just won’t cut it!
The only way the B1G’ll move the dial is to go big!
If expansion is inevitable and forthcoming, then I say do whatever it takes to land a couple blue blood fish of our own
Wouldn’t Texas A&M and Tennessee be an ever better fit for the conference. Invade the SEC I believe both would seriously consider the move.
Wouldn’t Notre Dame and Southern Cal make a nice addition to the B1G’s current roster {Nebraska, Penn St, Ohio St, Michigan} of blue blood programs?
If the money is there, then the existing contractual {and in the case of USC, logistical} concerns shouldn’t be that great of an impediment
Anything short of this and, in my opinion, the B1G ought just to leave well enough alone and stick with the 14 schools that are presently in the lineup
I didn't hire anyoneI can’t believe we hired a guy that is this incompetent.
It was definitely your faultI didn't hire anyone