Sorry no.Win today and we host.
Win the BIG tournament and we host supers. That is my belief.
Win out B10 title and maybe a regional. No chance for a super unless UCLA or GTech or NC loses it’s regional.
Sorry no.Win today and we host.
Win the BIG tournament and we host supers. That is my belief.
When you look at FSU, they are 7-10 in Q1 and we are 9-7. But their Q1 wins are on the lower edge. They are 0-7 against RPI top 15, while we are 5-2 against top 7. Included in that is a h2h win against them 10-1.
Southern Missouri built up their resume winning a lot of quality Tuesday games early in the season. But then faded in them later in the year. Does the committee look at pitching matchups because it's a lot different if you are lining up against their midweek guys, especially early in the year vs the weekend rotation. They seemed to be loved by the committee in the past though.
Oregon, Oregon State, Kansas, and VWU are all behind us and unless we drop the next 2 games, they will be solidly behind us, and even then, we probably stay solidly in the top 16.
Last year TCU got jumped over in hosting by Southern Miss, but that was 19 over 18. None of those teams have better metric than us and lack the quality wins, with the exception of Kansas because of the the 2 h2h wins against us.
If we were to win the tournament again this hear, I don't see how we don't move in the top 8 after beating USC and UCLA.
The guys that do these projections are usually not putting much thought into them. They will look at rankings or something and just fill in a bracket.I'm talking about those four teams being currently projected over Nebraska in the D1 tournament field, not the RPI. If the committee prioritizes the RPI over everything else, then you'll probably be right (assuming NU win the Big 10 tournament). The guys who project the field, who supposedly have conversations with the movers and shakers, take a more holistic approach. For example, what you say about Florida State is true, but they're also significantly ahead of Nebraska in things like strength of schedule, conference strength ratings, the DSR, and the KPI. It's all good, though. Just opinions to think about at this point.
Is it your position that the committee would take the unprecedented position in leaving out a high RPI team out of the host spot? There is absolutely 0 chance that if we are 11 or 12 in the RPI, like we are now, we aren't hosting.Sorry no.
Win out B10 title and maybe a regional. No chance for a super unless UCLA or GTech or NC loses it’s regional.
The guys that do these projections are usually not putting much thought into them. They will look at rankings or something and just fill in a bracket.
Right now, the gap to FSU is too wide. But let's say they are they are the 8 and we are the 9, we are going to make a good case for it. We would have work to do to get there and the BIG tournament would give us that opportunity.
Our RPI is 10 today. If we win the B1G tourney why wouldn't we move above #8 USC into at least the 9 slot and possibly 8 by beating UCLA? So logically why wouldn't we have a chance to host supers unless your only excuse is that we're in the B1G and only the SEC plays baseball?Sorry no.
Win out B10 title and maybe a regional. No chance for a super unless UCLA or GTech or NC loses it’s regional.