Why didn’t they just stop at 6? Why piss us off? And what’s with Moos being on there? Take him off and stop at 5.
Last edited:
-
You do not need to register if you are not going to pay the yearly fee to post. If you register please click here or log in go to "settings" then "my account" then "User Upgrades" and you can renew.
Pre-Fall Camp Husker News
- Thread starter Red Reign
- Start date
Why didn’t they just stop at 6? Why piss us off? And what’s with Moos being on there? Take him off and stop at 5.
Are you advocating for a QB by committee approach? Interesting.
Byrne should be #1
Devaney #2
Dannen & Alberts should be #3 and #4
Eichorst & Pederson should be with Perlman--not on the list!
I agree with your top 4 … I think Dannen is or will be slightly ahead of Alberts. Not so sure about Devaney but certainly was a long time ago.
The dude that hired Bob D3vaney should be up there. Tippy Dye?
This is the second time I am typing in a reply. I have no idea what happened to the first post.
I am happy to clear up any confusion.
I should have said "Except for the first sentence, same goes for the QB room".
For the first 3 games, depending on the game situation, I would like to see QB #2 play during the second series of the second quarter. This gives QB #1 a chance to see the defense from a different point of view. And QB #2 gets some real game experience for the season.
I would start QB #1 in the second half. I would like to see both QB #2 and QB #3 get some time in late in the third and fourth quarters, just to get some game experience in case there is an injury to QB #1.
All of these decisions have to be made during the games, depending on the situation at that time. Even though I think this is a good idea, Matt and Dana have not asked me to be available to make that decision during game time.
This is the second time I am typing in a reply. I have no idea what happened to the first post.
I am happy to clear up any confusion.
I should have said "Except for the first sentence, same goes for the QB room".
For the first 3 games, depending on the game situation, I would like to see QB #2 play during the second series of the second quarter. This gives QB #1 a chance to see the defense from a different point of view. And QB #2 gets some real game experience for the season.
I would start QB #1 in the second half. I would like to see both QB #2 and QB #3 get some time in late in the third and fourth quarters, just to get some game experience in case there is an injury to QB #1.
All of these decisions have to be made during the games, depending on the situation at that time. Even though I think this is a good idea, Matt and Dana have not asked me to be available to make that decision during game time.
The dreaded site refresh.
Easy to stay off this list--don't sign any 5* recruits.
Is it just an AI thing to spam the world with these stupid ranked lists on everything? You at least need to define what criteria you are ranking them by. Best hair?
Putting Moos above Alberts is certainly a take. Alberts’ departure is skewing the quality of what he did accomplish. Moos failed to provide oversight and mentorship that Frost needed.
Alberts needed to evolve on NIL. That was his weakest issue. But otherwise right up until his departure he was among the best we’ve had.
Devaney (stupid autocorrect )probably had the easiest tenure.
We’ve had a couple terrible tenures.
Last edited:
Last edited:
Or develop the people you recruit.
