• You do not need to register if you are not going to pay the yearly fee to post. If you register please click here or log in go to "settings" then "my account" then "User Upgrades" and you can renew.

HuskerMax readers can save 50% on  Omaha Steaks .

Locked due to no posts in 60 days. Report 1st post if need unlocked [OWH] Spring cleaning: What we’ve learned about the Huskers so far (Sam McKewon)

Status
Not open for further replies.
to me it All comes down to the line blocking well, they do, and any of the RB look good, QB's have time make better decisions.
That being said you have to have the best athletes on on field and are able to make plays. I just us to dominate again
 

I get a kick out of people saying it's too early to tell, then saying it's a two-man race that Armstrong has already won. I will concede that apparently Bush and Armstrong are in the lead, but I bet the coaches haven't given up on the other two. And here's why: Not only can a lot happen the rest of of Spring, guys who are willing to put in the time, can show major improvement between the end of Spring practice and the beginning of Fall practice.

I believe so much of what's going on is mental. Everyone is learning a new offense, which evens the playing field quite a bit, though Armstrong's game experience, even in a different offense, does give him the edge. However, because it's mental, the other qbs can make up a lot of ground after Spring practice by learning the offense better and working on the flaws in their games, as pointed out to them by Langsdorf and Riley. Come the start of Fall practice the coaches will give huge points to those two areas. The player who learns the offense the best, and the player who shows the most improvement on his individual flaws. Given everything we've been able to read, that might indicate that Armstrong is in the lead, and is likely to give it up to Bush by the opening game.

Concerning the confidence issue, I've seen kids go both ways. They never get over it and disappear. Or some light goes on and years later you read the story about the summer something clicked or something someone's dad or grandmother or coach said that turned it around.
 
to me it All comes down to the line blocking well, they do, and any of the RB look good, QB's have time make better decisions.
That being said you have to have the best athletes on on field and are able to make plays. I just us to dominate again

Exactly. A great OL makes any backfield decision less crucial.
 
Last edited:
to me it All comes down to the line blocking well, they do, and any of the RB look good, QB's have time make better decisions.
That being said you have to have the best athletes on on field and are able to make plays. I just us to dominate again

Honestly, I'm more concerned with this than our quarterbacking...
 



Not trying to speak for Merle, but for myself this is the first time I can remember in a long time when we've had a dedicated QB coach (as well as a HC who has a reputation for developing QBs himself).

I feel certain that the best candidate for the QB job will get the position, whoever that may be (as well as continuing to be coached-up throughout the season). I am not as certain this occurred to the same degree in the past, for whatever reason; whether it may be different skill-sets being sought for the offense being run, or some other reason.
Maybe this is nitpicking, but we don't have a "dedicated" QB coach; Langsdorf is the OC. The last guy I remember at NU with the title of QB coach was Turner Gill.
That said, Langsdorf/Riley should be an upgrade in quarterback coaching.
 
Honestly, I'm more concerned with this than our quarterbacking...

If our QB's are running for their life back there, doesn't matter who is behind center. Ameer bailed them out IMO constantly last year, I know easier said than done, but good line play helps it all. Takes 11 guys doing their part
 
Maybe this is nitpicking, but we don't have a "dedicated" QB coach; Langsdorf is the OC. The last guy I remember at NU with the title of QB coach was Turner Gill.
That said, Langsdorf/Riley should be an upgrade in quarterback coaching.
Langsdorf is also listed as the QB coach in addition to being the OC. We are limited to 9 ACs. We have 4 on Defense, 4 on offense, and 1 as the STC. On offense we need position coaches for OL. WR, RB, and QB. What is your plan for having an AC be a dedicated OC without any additional responsibilities? For instance, would you suggest that 1 AC coach 2 positions? There are very few teams in football that have a dedicated OC with no other responsibilities. The main point is that we actually have a specialist coaching QBs now, not a first time QB coach who was also a first time OC.
 




Maybe this is nitpicking, but we don't have a "dedicated" QB coach; Langsdorf is the OC. The last guy I remember at NU with the title of QB coach was Turner Gill.
That said, Langsdorf/Riley should be an upgrade in quarterback coaching.


Sorry, My Bad! :eek: Guess I shouldn't have used the word 'dedicated.' I think we can agree GoldenHusker says a little better what I was trying to convey; we have a 'QB Specialist' coaching our QBs now.
 



check out the 2014 roster. Tim Beck had the exact same title.
"Dedicated" means that's all he does. We don't have a dedicated quarterbacks coach. We may have a better quarterbacks coach, but that's a different point.
If there weren't any caps on the size of the staff, I'd happily agree with you. But there is, and it is almost impossible to finagle this without the HC being the acting and actual OC who makes all of the calls. This is why most teams have a combo OC & QB coach.
 

check out the 2014 roster. Tim Beck had the exact same title.
"Dedicated" means that's all he does. We don't have a dedicated quarterbacks coach. We may have a better quarterbacks coach, but that's a different point.


That's fine. Beck was OC/QB coach. I just posted the picture for reference.

On the other point, why do we need one? Just looking at tOSU (Beck :lol:), Oregon, Auburn, Florida State and Alabama it seems they don't. As a matter of fact it looks like having an OC coaching QB's is pretty common and makes a certain amount of sense. You could also make the same argument against the dedicated Special Teams coach but that's Coach Riley's call as it is the other assistants.

If you're saying we need a position coach dedicated to QB's then I would disagree. I think it's a better idea to have the OC coach QB's just to have the QB as an extension of the coach on the field. If it was a more common practice then you would have the beginnings of a point but ultimately it's the head coaches preference.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

GET TICKETS


Get 50% off on Omaha Steaks

Back
Top