We certainly could have benefitted from having WR here. It's silly for anyone to think it didn't sting to lose his talent. Think about it, instead of rolling out Liewer or Falck, you could have WR line up with a Betts, Martin, Toure, and Manning. Now that would be scary. Then again, SF would probably still play Liewer more than WR at this point.Agree, losing Wandale didn't hurt us as much as most thought. We are distributing the ball better without him. He was an excellent player, but the move probably benefited both parties
Last edited: