What I'm struggling with is, where are the reliable data? The CDC is saying Nebraska (what, ALL of Nebraska???) Is now a hot spot, based on "% positivity". Unless I'm missing something, "% positivity" is absolutely meaningless. Say, last month 10,000 people got tested, with 50 positives. That's 0.5%. Well maybe everyone was concerned they might have it last month, so they all got tested. Yesterday 100 people got tested, and there was one positive. So that means our "% positivity" doubled.
I don't know if that's how they're using the data. But I know the media get the story wrong the majority of the time, even when they're trying to get it right. And the only thing worse than no data, is incorrect data. Or people who don't know how to interpret the data.
I don't know if that's how they're using the data. But I know the media get the story wrong the majority of the time, even when they're trying to get it right. And the only thing worse than no data, is incorrect data. Or people who don't know how to interpret the data.