they played the chargers, then the dolphins, seahawks and tampa bay in three straight weeks so your data is flawed.Would have been 28-17 Philly had Purdy stayed in -- best case scenario for San Fran. Niners were a sloppy mess all day. And the Eagles could run on their defense -- unlike just about anyone else.
Purdy had no chance against the #1 pass defense, #1 sack total in the NFL. He would have been assaulted several more times had he not gone out with an elbow injury. Never faced a team near that level of pressure.
Niners were gifted with 9 of their last 12 games at home before today. And San Fran only played ONE playoff team the last 8 regular season games -- and that was a rotten Tampa team that only got in the playoffs because the worst division in football had to send somebody to the postseason.
The Niners haven't had an upper-level QB in many years. That's not how they win football games. Hurts matters more to Philly's offense than Purdy or Jimmy G. Neither would be special elsewhere.
It is also an assumption that sf wouldn't have adjusted to the rush if Purdy was still in..sf was moving the ball when he got hurt and fumbled. Burrows git sacked 4 times early and then not for a long spell.
your the last paragraph supports why sf would have been competitive if purdy stayed in...sf has a lot of talent on o also, but with no throwing threat it was over.