There used to be the old saying as the key to success: run the ball, stop the run.
We aren't really good at either.
That worked just fine against OU. They stopped our limited run game, dared AM to pass -- and he did so with flying colors. OU's defense has been shredded by the pass game many times in recent years -- and this year as well by both Tulane and Nebraska.
Big Ten football is a different game than Sooners/Big 12 football.
Interestingly, OU was very successful at running against our defense -- nearly 200 yards on the ground, averaging 5.5 yards per carry. But that's not their bread and butter with Rattler, so they didn't commit to it as much as they maybe should have.
Regardless, if our defense has an Achilles heel, it's been in stopping a quality run game. We saw it last year, and we've seen previews of that again this year.
Nebraska is ranked 76th nationally in run defense. In rushing yards per attempt, we're 71st.
Michigan State loves to run, as we know.
Minnesota will want to run, Iowa will want to run, Wisconsin will want to run. We've got to find a way to prevent those types of offenses from dictating the tempo and ultimately the scoreboard.
And as impressive as AM's day passing was against OU, that was on a warm, dry, nearly calm wind day. The heart of Big Ten season offers very few days like that. We need to find a way to develop a better run game (other than Martinez RPOs and broken play scrambles) -- but I'm not sure we can with a struggling offensive line.
I have been impressed with AM this season -- he's taken a step up for sure. So much so, I can't imagine what we'd do without him. Would be nice if we could find a competent enough run game that he doesn't have to carry the load all season -- don't want too many opportunities to turn our #2 QB into our #1.
If Big Ten play is going to require us to run the ball and stop the run to win games, can we do that?