The huskers greatest runs came after decisons by ADs to have a coach tweak things rather than fire people. Isnt that interesting.
1991/1992 - I was in college. I was frustrated. Fans screamed for Mcbrides head. Fan (some) screamed to replace TO. Fans screamed to replace the option.
Instead, they stuck with TO. Stuck with CM. Stuck with the option and tweaked the D. Added the unity council. NU never has one of the greatest runs in CF history if firings instead of tweeks occur.
2021 - Husker BB was on a streak as poor as any weve had, and that says a lot about where we were considering the program. Many wanted Fred gone. Hated Fred. The AD stuck with Fred, he tweaked things. Culture change. D emphasis. Age emphasis (get old). We go on a run thats never happened here, because we chose to tweak as opposed to firing. We go along with the fire crowd, NU BB never has its magical run
2002. Frank is allowed to change his staff. Yea, some firings occured, etc....but the AD chose Tweaks/overhaul for the HC rather than firing the HC. 2003 is a massive turnaround and then Pedey fires everyone and the 20 year downfall occurs. No telling if sticking with Franks works but firing didnt.
My point is this, there are times when coaches should be fired AKA Scott Frost. But there has been solid evidence that many times, letting the right guy tweak thinks as opposed to firing is the better option. We literally do not have the best run at our biggest mens sports, if ADs cave to the "fire him crowd". Thats fact.
I feel like many who yell fire today, are the same smart fans that would have or maybe was yelling fire in 1992, 2002, and 2021. Not because firing was smart, but because they just like to fire the guy in most cases. Those fans just cant use common sense. They just say fire the coach anytime things dont go well.
Lets remember this. Our AD a month ago was trying to do that
GBR